It is probably due to a number of people stopping using their alts after some instance hopping.

Also a few people who came to see how it was, and weren’t attracted enough to become regular visitors.

Curious to see at which number we’ll stabilize.

Next peak will probably happen after either major features release (e.g. exhaustive mod tools allowing reluctant communities to move from Reddit) or the next Reddit fuck up (e.g. removing old.reddit)

Stats on each server: https://lemmy.fediverse.observer/list

  • FoxBJK@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    “Big tech company bad, Twitter dead, Linux good”

    Add Firefox in there and yes I’ve seen this everywhere. So many posts about browser news or the web that just devolves into a circlejerk about how great Firefox is.

    • bugsmith@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I get it with the others, but given what Google is currently trying to do with Chrome and the open web, I think the Firefox evangelism is the least sinful of these by far. Or maybe I just became part of the problem.

      • FoxBJK@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s not inherently bad, I don’t even disagree with it. It’s just that (A) we all get it, enough already and (B) the open web is about letting people use whichever browser they want, so it’s kinda paradoxical that we all say we should all be using the same browser

        • bugsmith@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s not even that these evangelizers think we should all be using the same browser. It’s that there are currently only two realistic choices: Chrome (and it’s derivatives) and Firefox (and it’s derivatives). There is safari too, of course, but it hardly compares to either in it’s current state.

          Given those two choices, only one of them is in support of the open web. The other is literally trying to add DRM to the web.

          As to your first point: I agree that here it may be preaching to the choir and that we all get it. But it has such a small marketshare, I’m not sure it is good for those encouraging it to be quitened.

          • FoxBJK@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            There is safari too, of course, but it hardly compares to either in it’s current state

            Curious to hear you elaborate on this. It’s the #2 browser by marketshare and Apple, while slower in the past, seems to be hearing developer feedback and catching up to what we’re asking.