Meldrik@lemmy.wtfM to Facepalm@lemmy.wtf · 28 days agoYou couldn't just, like, place the wheelchair at the sides??lemmy.wtfimagemessage-square72fedilinkarrow-up1932arrow-down119file-textcross-posted to: wtf@lemmy.wtf
arrow-up1913arrow-down1imageYou couldn't just, like, place the wheelchair at the sides??lemmy.wtfMeldrik@lemmy.wtfM to Facepalm@lemmy.wtf · 28 days agomessage-square72fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: wtf@lemmy.wtf
minus-squaremodus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up26·27 days agoWhat would the symbol for “no homeless” look like? A house crossed out twice?
minus-squareRozaŭtuno@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up25arrow-down1·27 days ago What would the symbol for “no homeless” look like? ✝️
minus-squareGelatinGeorge@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·27 days agoThat’s the first time I’ve ever double-taked a sentence before. Nice.
minus-squarecheesymoonshadow@lemmings.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·27 days ago🏠 inside 🚫 inside another 🚫 ?
minus-squareRememberTheApollo_@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·27 days agoYou could probably just get away with the “no” over the home. “You have no home”, “this is not your home” simultaneously.
minus-squareflerp@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up3·27 days agoI’ve seen no camping signs with a tent crossed out and of course no loitering signs are a classic excuse to harass homeless people
What would the symbol for “no homeless” look like? A house crossed out twice?
✝️
You know, in theory
That’s the first time I’ve ever double-taked a sentence before. Nice.
🏠 inside 🚫 inside another 🚫 ?
You could probably just get away with the “no” over the home. “You have no home”, “this is not your home” simultaneously.
I’ve seen no camping signs with a tent crossed out and of course no loitering signs are a classic excuse to harass homeless people