Microsoft warned customers this Tuesday to patch a critical TCP/IP remote code execution (RCE) vulnerability with an increased likelihood of exploitation that impacts all Windows systems using IPv6, which is enabled by default.
Microsoft warned customers this Tuesday to patch a critical TCP/IP remote code execution (RCE) vulnerability with an increased likelihood of exploitation that impacts all Windows systems using IPv6, which is enabled by default.
The problem is that IPV6 is only half implemented at best. Do you know how many software vendors have “disable IPV6” in their documentation? Because it’s a lot. I, as a sysadmin, have no control over that. I can’t make these vendors implement IPV6, if they haven’t done it yet they clearly aren’t in a hurry to. I’m not talking about gamers, I’m talking about niche legacy software and internal proprietary programs, older networked hardware (like door systems) often don’t support IPV6. I feel like IPV6 was created because we were running out of IPV4 addresses, and then the world realized we could just NAT everything and stopped caring. I was there Gandalf, I was there 3,000 years ago on 512K day, when the strength of IPV4 failed. Trust me I want nothing more than for IPV6 to work and be universally adopted, but here we are 30 years later