• Ohmmy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’m not sure it was the designers but the executives. Touchscreens are insanely cheap compared to buttons and all the wiring involved. Like the main reason that Tesla does everything on a touch screen is that software is soooo much cheaper than hardware.

    • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’s like everyone collectively forgot about precisely how much effort has been put into physical human interface design over the years. In models from less than a decade ago, Mercedes was calibrating dashboard push buttons to require precisely one Newton of force to actuate… and now we have this “slap the screen in the vicinity of what is maybe a button a few times to maybe get the thing you want to happen”. I know, it’s cheaper, but… come on.

      • Ohmmy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        3 months ago

        Because execs gauge by the stock market and Tesla’s stock valuation was more than Toyota’s for some reason. Number must go up, always and cutting costs makes number go up.

    • barsquid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      The screen is necessary for the backup camera, which is a legal requirement in the US. Why make a usable dashboard when you can save money by adding all functions in the screen?