The disgraced R&B singer’s defence attorney, Jennifer Bonjean, has filed a petition to the Supreme Court, requesting to throw out his Chicago conviction for possession of child pornography and enticing minors to engage in sexual activity, claiming that the charges should be barred by the statute of limitations.

R. Kelly was already serving a 30-year sentence for sex trafficking, stemming from his 2021 New York case, at the time he was convicted of child pornography in Chicago for which he was sentenced to 20 years in 2023. He is also appealing the New York conviction, though that case is not part of the high court petition.

In the petition, Bonjean argues that the musician was wrongly retroactively prosecuted under a federal law – the PROTECT Act – which passed in 2003 and made the statute of limitations indefinite for sex crimes with minors.

  • kandoh@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    I wonder how those lawyers feel about taking his money to do stuff like this

    • Eezyville@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Everyone has a right to fairness under the law and it’s their lawyer’s job to ensure that. The lawyers who protect the rights of the people who disgust you are the same lawyers who protect the rights of the people you sympathize with.

      • kandoh@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 months ago

        Defense lawyers doing all they can is good, I’m really just curious about their personal feelings on this specific case and how much they’re charging