• Ultraviolet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    You’d be right in this case too. It’s extremely sketchy, it’s pretty much absolute censorship power with only an informal promise that it won’t be used for anything nefarious (but a refusal to actually codify anything preventing that). “Harmful content” is left very conveniently vague.

      • 0laura@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        if they decide that treating the “transgendereds” like people is “harmful to children” then it’ll be banned.