Wtf are you even talking about exactly? I’m glad she is the nominee, it improves our chances, and never once said anything slightly against Harris. The people with the most severe confirmation bias also tend to be extremists who label anyone not with their identical same opinion as a sociopath
I criticized the prick for being a prick and that was very obvious. Both that their intention was that and that I wished to point it out. Now tell me again about my love for genocide. Would you rate it as an eleven on a scale of one to ten, or a twelve?
Now tell me again about my love for genocide. Would you rate it as an eleven on a scale of one to ten, or a twelve?
So much that you were willing to support it even if it meant losing to Trump.
God DAMN, just look the fuck around you. Biden is out. Harris is surging in the polls. Democrats are excited to vote instead of resentful and apathetic. And you’re calling them pricks because they like Harris more than Bidenyahu.
I’m a human, so there’s a 99.999999% chance that genocide is something I find appalling, and as that’s such a ridiculous accusation, my repeated sarcasm about it confirms that I’m not in that tiny tiny weird minority of sociopaths.
I have been repeatedly on Lemmy (and ITT) expressing that I think that replacing Biden with Harris was a good move.
Given that I’ve never expressed an iota of support for Netanyahu/Israel and I deny it when weirdo cavassers lie about it, there would be no valid basis for saying that repeatedly.
Anything else you want to intentionally lieaccidentally get wrong about me? What accurate thing did you say again?
I’ve never supported Trump. You have repeatedly accused me of such for saying that the US should not be selling weapons for genocide. You’ve always been angrier at opposition to genocide than you have been toward those committing and supporting it.
Democrats should not be supporting genocide. This simple sentence still gets you calling people trumpers. Even though it’s true. Democrats have no business even entertaining support for genocide. Everyone should be ashamed of the actions of those who enable the continued genocide in Gaza.
It’s not a smear. I’m accurately describing your attitude to people who oppose genocide.
Harris picked up a voter, so you’re mad.
Wtf are you even talking about exactly? I’m glad she is the nominee, it improves our chances, and never once said anything slightly against Harris. The people with the most severe confirmation bias also tend to be extremists who label anyone not with their identical same opinion as a sociopath
So why are you so mad at someone who said they were going to vote for her?
I criticized the prick for being a prick and that was very obvious. Both that their intention was that and that I wished to point it out. Now tell me again about my love for genocide. Would you rate it as an eleven on a scale of one to ten, or a twelve?
So much that you were willing to support it even if it meant losing to Trump.
God DAMN, just look the fuck around you. Biden is out. Harris is surging in the polls. Democrats are excited to vote instead of resentful and apathetic. And you’re calling them pricks because they like Harris more than Bidenyahu.
Wow so shocking you would misrepresent my views in such an absurd manner that no one would take you seriously
Nothing I said was inaccurate in the slightest.
Well let’s see.
Anything else you want to
intentionally lieaccidentally get wrong about me? What accurate thing did you say again?I’ve never supported Trump. You have repeatedly accused me of such for saying that the US should not be selling weapons for genocide. You’ve always been angrier at opposition to genocide than you have been toward those committing and supporting it.
Democrats should not be supporting genocide. This simple sentence still gets you calling people trumpers. Even though it’s true. Democrats have no business even entertaining support for genocide. Everyone should be ashamed of the actions of those who enable the continued genocide in Gaza.
You’re not.