Don’t worry about control or being unable to react in time etc or how it affects you physically.

  • odium@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    4 months ago

    Run at a 100.

    Flying at 10 mph gets you locked up in a CIA lab.

    Run at 100 lets you become a professional runner (just run slightly faster than the record. Don’t run at a 100 mph.).

  • wargreymon@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Although flying appears much more fun, running at 100mph is pretty insane, it turns you into half as fast as Sonic.

    I could dash off rooftop at that speed and then glide on wingsuit, should get me quite far, I choose running.

  • DJKJuicy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    I think that would depend on how much work either of these are.

    Does running 100mph feel the same as normal running?

    How much work is flying?

    If running and flying are the same amount of work, then I probably won’t be able to fly very far.

    Edit

    Nevermind, OP said don’t worry about the physical part.

    I WANT TO FLY.

  • idledrift@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    4 months ago

    I’d say fly 10 mph, might still be faster than running 100mph when going to point b. You can fly high then glide down at a faster speed and any destination is a direct line.

    • mipadaitu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      10mph is pretty dang fast, especially since you can just go over buildings and obstacles. Slower than a bike in a straight line, but much faster otherwise when you don’t need roads.

      In most populated areas, you can get just about anywhere faster than any other mode of transportation.

  • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 months ago

    Fly, thank you.

    When I have dreams of flying, it isn’t fast. It’s just floating along and enjoying the journey. Besides, it’s faster than walking, especially with being disabled and stuck using a cane.

    So, even if running that fast took away the disability while running, I’d still rather fly. Id still rather fly if it was at my walking speed

    • SnokenKeekaGuard@lemmy.dbzer0.comOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      When we walk of run atleast we have our limbs moving. With flying I feel like it would be more boring, it would feel like being in an elevator. Also pull a lot of attention.

  • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Fly. Cars are much easier to get a seat on than planes. Also, slow flying in tight areas is really hard for aircraft to do, so I’ll have some pretty unique capabilities - you could argue 10 is better than 1000.

  • stoy@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    If I pick running, then I’ll need super sight and reactions as well since there will be other people and cars on the path/roads.

    Flying, yep.

    • 0laura@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      no better reaction or sight than when driving at 100mph. the issue would probably be the wind or your shoes or something like that.

  • Didros@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    Everyone saying run, how do you know you can’t? 🤔

    I’ve always thought that if I could fly, it would probably tire me out faster than running, which tires me out faster than walking. If that were the case, honestly? I ain’t running places either, what makes you think I would fly there?