• _thisdot
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why is this a bad thing? With all the email analogies, it’s a good thing to have bigger corporations involved

    • frozengriever@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      One issue with emails is that it’s actually very difficult to self host email servers now as most of the bigger servers would automatically block unknown servers due to spam

    • MagicShel@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Pretty much the entire bdsm community everywhere was outed on Facebook because folks carried cellphones to events and Facebook started suggesting friends to one another. Fifteen years ago privacy was sacrosanct and no one shared real life names unless they were very close. Now there is no point to trying to keep your identity secret and it sounds silly to introduce yourself as “Master Darkness” or whatever. I mean it sounded silly then, too, but everyone understood the necessity and it was situationally appropriate.

      That is the danger of these large corporations. They aren’t looking to serve the broad community - they are looking to exploit our social graph for profit regardless of the destruction in their wake.

      • _thisdot
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        To me this sounds like us de-federating them early on to avoid them de-federating us. It’s an open framework enabling multi domain interoperability. As long as fediverse rules aren’t violated no one should get defederated imo

        Again tbh, I don’t really think Meta needs Fediverse. They already have Facebook and Instagram. All they need is add one link and they’ll have way more users than the Fediverse has in a matter of hours