like, im not one to usually say stuff, but uh, tolkien was very direct with how aragorn looked, from the books: “As Frodo drew near he threw back his hood, showing a shaggy head of dark hair flecked with grey, and in a pale stern face a pair of keen grey eyes.”

  • shapesandstuff@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Artistic freedom. I don’t understand why people are so glued to the words.

    Just as Peter Jackson took artistic liberties. Even Tolkien himself switched some descriptions quite drastically between the concepts and the published books.

    Just enjoy it as something new.

    • Mandy@beehaw.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      honestly, more importantly, remember when magic the gathering wasnt about a constant stream of crossovers?

      • shapesandstuff@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I mean sure, but thats a completely differeny topic imo. It’s easy enough for me to ignore those that I don’t care for.

        • Mandy@beehaw.orgOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Wouldnt it be much much cooler if they create their own characters instead of changing existent characters and hijacking their legacy? (keep in mind i mean that in all directions not just what is presented here)

  • xergi0kthebirdman@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    True, but creative freedom is a thing. This whole set is just a reason to make a single card for people to go nuts trying to find anyway.