That said

  • Voidance [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    6 days ago

    I do think that a rational society would locate a problem like this and invest in solving it, rather than have a handful of scientists drip feed terrifying new theories and discoveries to a sensationalist media intent on scaring the shit out of people. But maybe it’s the only way they can attract funding for more study, I don’t know. I don’t think it’s really useful for people to be hearing about all these crazy environmental poisons - forever chemicals, microplastics, and so on - that are basically impossible to avoid and which no-one yet understands the implications of.

    • Alaskaball [comrade/them]@hexbear.netOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      6 days ago

      I mean I think there’s info coming out about microplastics contributing to heart attacks and strokes by forming clots in the circulatory system, so if we got plastics in our blood and balls it’s not too far of a stretch to say we got plastics in our dangle dongles too

      • Voidance [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        6 days ago

        Yes I know, I just think I would be a lot happier not knowing. I mean everyone is already riddled with anxiety. At least with politics we can study and understand and exert some agency however small. What can we do about the fact people are pumping our bodies full of plastic for profit? And then when they repeatedly put these articles in the press before they’ve discovered the implications (I mean maybe microplastics cause ED but they’re really just spitballing here) it doesn’t seem to have much social utility