As requested, a thread for general snarking that may not need its own post.

  • Uterusofsteel@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    2 months ago

    Just cause they are “vintage” doesn’t mean they are attractive shoes. They aren’t timeless. They look dated and are kinda ugly. She just wanted them for the label and the dopamine hit. I can’t imagine what she would even pair with those.

    What baffles me is that she has enough money to buy new designer that’s more on trend or classic. I don’t know why she doesn’t.

    • ladybonerforjustice@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      She doesn’t even know what vintage is! She thought Le Chateau shoes from 2015 were vintage lol. I’m pretty sure only 20+ years is considered vintage. Resellers have capitalized on the ignorance of people like SNL and call everything vintage.

    • VirgoSnarker@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Because she doesn’t actually have her own style identity, or personal style worth investing in - she chases the dopamine hit of people telling her she looks cool or trendy. With the buying habits we see, they could be in serious financial trouble if she bought designer instead of Amazon 🤣 and she couldn’t add her ever present but barely legible affiliate to designer links… this grifter lives grift first