The Nevada Democratic Party is seeking to invalidate the Green Party’s effort to land on the state’s November ballot, arguing it did not gather enough valid signatures to gain ballot access.

The Green Party has not been on a Nevada general election ballot since 2008, when its candidate received around 1,400 votes. Including a qualified minor party on the ballot — one potentially able to pull dissatisfied left-leaning voters away from the Democratic Party — could have major impacts on the presidential race in Nevada, where President Joe Biden defeated Donald Trump in 2020 by only about 33,000 votes out of more than a million cast.

The Green Party gathered nearly 30,000 petition signatures to land on the general election ballot, well more than the required amount of 10,095 signatures, which must be split evenly across Nevada’s four congressional districts. The party announced Monday that “as of this moment, the Nevada Green Party is on the Ballot.” The party has not submitted a candidate yet for the November ballot, but the party’s former presidential candidate Jill Stein is running again this year. Stein called the lawsuit “outrageous” in a video posted to her campaign website.

Lawyers representing the Nevada Democratic Party filed public records requests to review the Green Party’s submitted signatures and petition, but the lawsuit said they had only received a handful of signatures and no copies of the petition.

“We have filed this challenge to preserve our rights to inspect the petitions consistent with Nevada state law,” Hilary Barrett, the executive director of the Nevada Democratic Party, said in a statement.

  • ChihuahuaOfDoom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    4 months ago

    It sounds like this is to verify the signatures that the Green party submitted/is submitting in order to gain ballot access.

    • geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2024/06/12/jxvj-j12.html

      Call noted that the Democrats are suing the Nevada secretary of state, Democrat Francisco Aguilar, because his office provided “an incomplete file of our petitions,” which Call surmised would “be resolved simply by the Secretary of State providing them the complete file.”

      Call clarified that the Green Party did not submit the required paperwork late. Instead, he wrote, “the Nevada Secretary of State processed it late and we have an affidavit to that effect.”

      The Democratic Party campaign has mobilized vast resources, with millions of dollars and an army of lawyers deployed to block third-party challengers. Call said, “They are trying to bleed us out. A tactic of empire. I used the Wal-Mart analogy due to Wal-Mart’s strategy of putting its competitor out of business through overwhelming resources.”

      Responding to the anti-democratic actions of the Democratic Party, Socialist Equality Party candidate for US president Joseph Kishore denounced “the efforts of the Democratic Party to keep Jill Stein off the ballot in Nevada. The SEP supports the right of all third-party candidates to get on the ballot.”

      Kishore wrote that the Democrats’ efforts “to block candidates from obtaining ballot status is an attack on the most basic democratic right, the right to vote. The two parties of the capitalist ruling elite want to prevent workers and youth from having the ability to vote for anyone besides Biden and Trump.”

  • frog_brawler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    20
    ·
    4 months ago

    Stein is a Russian asset. While this set of actions may superficially seem a bit sketchy; this problem really shouldn’t need to be addressed in the first place.

    • Copernican@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      I think any 3rd party that can be used by Russia and China to harm candidates for US office will receive funding, favorable news from state media, etc. from Russia and China whether those 3rd party candidates know it or not.

    • Carrolade@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      24
      ·
      4 months ago

      Any actual evidence of this? Usually when we make this claim we have some evidence.

        • Carrolade@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          arrow-down
          32
          ·
          4 months ago

          Yeah, not seeing any results saying she’s received Russian financing. Got anything else?

          • frog_brawler@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            28
            arrow-down
            15
            ·
            4 months ago

            At the time of your response, my “lmgtfy” link is exactly 3 minutes old. You very obviously did not read any of the many articles that came back.

            Go back under your bridge.

            • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              11
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              Top 3 links showing zero monetary or other link between Jill Stein and Russia. . Only liberals grasping at straws to blame someone else for Hillary throwing the 2016 elections. Gotta keep the right wing propaganda flowing

            • Carrolade@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              16
              arrow-down
              28
              ·
              4 months ago

              Scrolled the headlines. Not one backs your claim. One last time, you got any actual evidence, or just “google it”?

              • frog_brawler@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                22
                arrow-down
                13
                ·
                edit-2
                4 months ago

                I provided with you the means to read several articles and you read none of them. You’re the horse that stands next to the river and dies of thirst; shortly after shitting into the river.

                • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 months ago

                  Sorry bro, that doesnt fly.

                  “Do your research” is republican bullshit.

                  You have proof, post it, directly. Its not a game of hide and seek. If you are so confident it exists, provide a direct link and stop playing games about it like a right winger.

                • Carrolade@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  14
                  arrow-down
                  23
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  Not one of those articles claims she got Russian financing. So, I guess you’re just making this up.

      • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        18
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        You’d need a million times less evidence to call Joe Biden an israeli plant but saying that is not allowed.

        Calling Jill Stein a “Russian asset” is fine though. Liberals love projecting their own corruption on others.

        • Carrolade@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          You can say whichever you want, this is the internet where people say shit all the time.

          Just preferably bring evidence better than “person A is helping person B”. In a complicated world that usually just means person A benefits somehow.

          An asset or a plant is a stronger claim though, it implies control. While that’s really fun when you’re young and looking through all the conspiracy theories, it doesn’t stand up well to adult level scrutiny, where details matter.

            • Carrolade@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              Yes, I am sure he is. Or at least was until he stopped the bomb shipments over Rafah. That does not imply espionage though, just a US President supporting a military ally in a genocide. For the 500th time in our history.

              edit: I’ll remind you how we treated our own Native Americans, incidentally, in our own dark past. Many of the few remaining, still to this day, live in crippling poverty. World is a complicated place.

              • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                11
                ·
                4 months ago

                Oh sure, my comment was referring to the other guy you were responding to. Who claimed that finding any vague relations to Jill Stein means she is a ‘Russian Asset’.

                Those extreme hyperboles can far more easily be applied to both Republicans and Democrats when it comes to israel

                • Carrolade@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  That I can agree with. The GOP is also very pro-Israel unfortunately. And they love feeling superior to brown people to boot.

        • JimSamtanko@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          Remember this?

          Wasn’t that you saying you aren’t posting in here anymore? This doesn’t help your credibility at all, especially when you cast aspersions at others.

          Of course, the amount of posts/comments you’ve had removed for misinformation doesn’t help much either…

          Now, care to support your accusation that liberals are projecting corruption? What corruption specific to this conversation is being projected? And what liberals? Give up some names.

  • geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    4 months ago

    STOP THE STEAL! STOP THE STEA…

    Oh wait sorry

    “Please verify the signatures that the Green party submitted/is submitting in order to gain ballot access.”

    • ChihuahuaOfDoom@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      Never thought I’d live to see the day where I’d be accused of being a republican because I think we should follow the rules. I do think the democrats want to keep the Green Party off the ballot but I also question how they got 30,000 signatures for an election where they don’t even have a candidate declared (it’ll be Jill Stein, but still).

      • geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        4 months ago

        The Republicans also just want to check Hillary’s emails and find out what’s beneath Pizza Hut. They are really concerned about it.

  • specialseaweed@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Texas Republicans have been financing Green Party ballot registrations around the country for years and years.

    Yea. You might wanna check those for accuracy.

    • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Like the Republicans have been financing top Democrats you mean right? As the biggest AIPAC donors are Republicans which have the Democratic party on their payroll.