• KobaCumTribute [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    There were different blocs. There were both weirdo libs and anti-Deng Maoists/ultras involved, who wanted diametrically opposite things. The western liberal narrative is that the maoists were a small bloc (if they acknowledge them at all) and the liberals were the bulk of the protesters, and AFAIK the ultra narrative is that the maoists were the main movement and the liberals were tangentially present wreckers.

    • AdeptusPrimaris@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      5 months ago

      Not to mention that the liberals were trying their hardest to get some bloodshed happening so that they could cry about the government’s ‘brutality’ and lack of democracy. I think one of the liberal leaders actually said that other atudents should be brutalised for her cause but not her because she was too important.

    • Elon_Musk [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      "4) When protests broke out in China in April 1989, demonstrators were not calling for democracy, but purer socialism, free of corruption and inequality, which were endemic at the time. Students carried pictures of Chairman Mao and sang the Chinese national anthem repeatedly.

      Western hybrid warfare includes two key principles:

      1. Locate and amplify GENUINE local grievances, and

      2. Rebrand them as calls for western liberal democracy and freedom."

      interesting