• BarqsHasBite@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It’s not about Scalia, it’s explaining the concept of justices making rulings based on their own identity and beliefs instead of facts and logic. To, you know, explain “All the current shit going on with the SC”.

    • postmateDumbass@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Bribery, corrruption, and buying court decisions are the issues of today.

      Personal identity and beliefs don’t factor in when its already bought and paid for.

    • Zippy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      If they have to go back 7 years to being up an example, that would indicate it is very rare they use only their identity to determine rulings.

      I don’t doubt they often ignore science but this article indicates that is not the case. Is there not something recent they could refer to?