• gregorum@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      6 months ago

      Strange, as you’ve clearly laid out the odds, risks, etc. and you’re betting your life on your supposed “beliefs”.

      Sure sounds like gambling to me…

        • gregorum@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          A risk assessment is a normal part of gambling. You’re just describing games, like the one you’re playing now to rationalize your gambling with your own life by avoiding getting any sort of health insurance.

        • roofuskit@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          6 months ago

          Insurance is by definition not gambling. It is only indemnity. The reality is that without insurance you are gambling that you’ll get to keep the money you didn’t spend on insurance and not be financially ruined.

            • gregorum@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              That’s not how health insurance works. You would never get more than your medical costs and would almost always get less.

                • gregorum@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  but as a single policy-holder there is a good chance they will pay me more then I pay out making it gambling.

                  But the risk isn’t health insurance vs gambling. That’s a straw man, as not having health insurance is already gambling, and you’re trying to change the argument because your previous reasoning was shown to be faulty.

                  Nice try.

        • gregorum@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          You’re gambling that there’s someone willing to pay that amount for your labor. The stakes? Your financial security.

            • PunnyName@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              6 months ago

              Then you need to define gambling and working in no uncertain or ambiguous terms.

              When describing that which you do not wish to partake in, you gotta be REAL clear.

              Then we can understand what you mean by gambling vs working.

            • gregorum@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              That is working.

              Not if you lose your bet that anyone is willing to pay you your desired wage. Then it’s unemployment because you gambled and lost. And even if they do agree, it’s just luck that you won— but it’s still a gamble.

                • gregorum@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  6 months ago

                  Good thing it’s typically mandated by state law. You don’t have a choice when it’s deducted from your paycheck in most cases, and you’re automatically enrolled. (In some states and situations, it’s paid for by the employers). Whether you ever take advantage of that is another matter.

                  However, that’s irrelevant. All you’ve done here is demonstrate poor decision-making skills, and a profound misunderstanding of the concepts of both insurance and gambling.