• Nagarjuna [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hey, I get that you’re defending your boy, but your post comes across a little as “you’re just too stupid for Marx.”

    I think your post misses the point though. Lots of people are told to “read Marx” when they come into the movement. It is, like you said, a scientifically dense text. This makes it a challenge for most people. This is a frustrating experience. The meme you’re complaining about is people venting a common frustration with a movement rite-of-padsage.

    But also, Marx finds ways to be unclear in some of his less rigorous texts. There’s a couple common sins:

    run on sentences that cover whole paragraphs

    Whole chapters where the evidence is laid out long before the argument and you have to read for pages without knowing where he’s going.

    Words that mean one thing in day-today speech and something else in Marx (reproduction, fetish, realization, valorize, sublimate, etc.)

    Jargon that doesn’t usually show up outside of Marxism: reify, proletarian, etc.

    Marx is unclear for 99% of people and pretending it’s easy makes you look like a big-brained elitist.