• assyrian@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      65
      ·
      5 months ago

      it’s not exactly a controversial or very original point to say that the meaning of antisemitism has been seriously trivialized, given how often it’s been used recently to mean justifiable criticism of israel

    • SorosFootSoldier [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      49
      ·
      5 months ago

      Israel has said flat out that it uses antisemitism accusations as a means to stifle criticism. Have you not seen the news since Oct. 7th? We have zionists swearing up and down that “from the river to the sea” is antisemitic for christ’s sake. It’s totally trivialized the word and given cover to actual antisemites, I’m talking real neo-nazis to spread hatred, it’s totally backfired.

        • AfterthoughtC - he/ him@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Zionist are just extremely disingenuous. I read Innuendo Studio’s curious cat and every Israel apologist there just talks like they are trying to get him in a gotcha. Some examples that come to mind:
          -Keep accusing him of wanting to exterminate Israel or being in the ‘Israel should not exist’ camp when his stand has always been ‘Israel should stop being an aparthied and grant equal rights to Palestinians’
          -Accusing him of comparing Jews to nazis (more often than not is other curious cat askers on his page that are comparing Israel, not the Jews, to the nazis). Every time he says ‘Israel is conducting genocide’ these hasbara brigaders jump to accusing him of calling Jews Hitler.
          -I remember one user who after Innuendo Studios said that Israel should stop being an ethnostate/ aparthied was like ‘oh so you support soft genocide where one race mixes with another to eventually produce offspring who dont resemble their parents’. When he called this mindset out as nazi shit they, predictably, accused him of calling Orthodox Jews nazis.
          -Inventing bullshit hypothetical scenarios that are not happening right now. Like wrt the Ansar Allah blockade one asker was like ‘would you still support them if they were nazis’. Basically what he called Values-Neutral Governance in the You Go High, We Go Low Alt-Right Playbook video.

          • zed_proclaimer [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            26
            ·
            5 months ago

            Israel should not exist. This is not anti-Semitic to say. Colonial projects have no legitimacy and Israel has no more right to existence than Rhodesia or Apartheid South Africa

    • zed_proclaimer [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      5 months ago

      it has when used by anyone besides leftists. Center and right cannot distinguish between anti-zionism and anti-semitism so they cannot be trusted when they cry wolf.

        • DyingOfDeBordom [none/use name]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          23
          ·
          5 months ago

          I think there might be something wrong with you if you don’t look at 99% of the accusations of antisemitism being levied at people who are like “don’t genocide Palestine” and see something wrong with that

          Or like shit like jk Rowling (who wrote very antisemitic caricatures in her shitty books) calling Corbyn an antisemite. Actually I literally only ever see accusations of antisemitism when it’s being used by right wingers like her in bad faith, or zionist Jews conflating criticism of Israeli imperialism with it.

          • theposterformerlyknownasgood@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            I think there has to be something very wrong with you if you think that dishonest accusations of antisemitism renders the concept meaningless. This is a garbage post, and if you genuinely think that antisemitism has ceased to be a factor because of people like Podhoretz then you are also a garbage person.

    • MolotovHalfEmpty [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      5 months ago

      Both can essentially be the case.

      In media especially, the popular use and meaning of antisemitism has been so thoroughly degraded and twisted that it’s not only largely useless, but I think should actually be a watchword for ‘more investigation of this claim is needed’.

      But that doesn’t mean that the original and accurate meaning and the thing it actually describes does not exist or is not a problem, or that we should accept it’s shameless misuse and attempted perversion.

        • zed_proclaimer [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Similarly, I am extremely grossed out by the common usage of the term “ethnic cleansing” to describe acts of violent displacement and genocide of people. It’s uncritically accepting the framing and language of the perpetrator of the crime, that they are doing a “cleansing” act by killing “unclean” people. That even leftists use the term gives me big heeby-jeebies.

          • JohnBrownNote [comrade/them, des/pair]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            5 months ago

            idk that compound always made the “cleansing” part sound really gross to me, like a nazi was saying it and winking, rather than any association with cleanliness. If you don’t hang out with newage crystal healing weirdos you probably don’t even hear the word “cleanse” outside of the genocidal context.

            • zed_proclaimer [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              5 months ago

              the term is not used with a wink though, as a satirical critique of perpetrators of genocide. It is used straight, as a flat description of the process of “genocide lite”. Like even international legal documents will call it “ethnic cleansing” which is not appropriate whatsoever in my view, to accept the Nazi phraseology in such explicit ways

              • WideningGyro [any]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                5 months ago

                It’s weird, I have too had issues with the term, but never really thought of it in the sense of accepting the language of the perpetrator. I just hate it in the context of Palestine, where it is sort of used by libs to, as you say, soften the accusation of genocide. This of course rests on the false premise that the Israeli don’t want to outright genocide Palestinians, but simply “drive them out”, as if Palestinians were just generic “arabs” who will immediately assimilate and become Egyptians, Jordanians, Syrians etc. if they flee, and not a unique people with a unique culture and a homeland - which the Israelis want to destroy and build fucking beach resorts on. It’s kind of a bullshit term for people too chickenshit to call a genocide what it is.

                Anyway, not sure I added anything to your point, I just thought your almost etymological objection to the word was interesting. Just another reason to call a genocidal spade a genocidal spade.