Certainly the ones who oppose it are wealthy elitists.

On the other hand, everything I have ever heard about this idea of “filling in” seems like homeowners who want to rent out their alley without having to conform new-built residences to code so they can maximize $$$$$.

Do other cities have this “movement”?

  • D61 [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    5 months ago

    An application with the City’s Committee of Adjustment (CoA) sought to bring a three-storey, eight-unit apartment building…

    the site of the proposed building is nestled within one of Toronto’s many wealthy enclaves of single-family housing…

    I’m sorry… what about an apartment building is a “tiny building”? Bad title, very misleading.

    • quilter@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 months ago

      I now added quote marks to the title in case it wasn’t clear that I am not saying this. Not certain if you or anybody was confused by that.

      To tell the truth I didn’t read the whole article. It was too annoying. I hate everyone involved too much. Thanks for putting in the work.

      • D61 [any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        Oh no comrade, I wasn’t trying to say that you were editorializing in the OP title. I could have been clearer that I was referencing the title of the blogpost (unless that’s your blog… which I hope not… because that would be a bit awkward)