• curiousaur@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    That’s only an issue for folks who don’t get the new one. The current one is feeling pretty underpowered already.

    • BluesF@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      I haven’t particularly felt mine is underpowered tbh. Obviously it’s a handheld so it doesn’t play the AAA graphics card melters on ultra haha. But yes, introducing a new one would affect everyone who doesn’t upgrade… Plus of course the benchmark being low benefits PC players with weaker hardware, too. Budget players, in other words, who perhaps can’t afford a £500+ upgraded deck. Seems a bit cold to just throw these folks under the bus.

      • curiousaur@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        That’s the issue with bottom specced hardware. It’s not future proof. It’s falls out of the window of acceptable performance much faster. Look at the Horizon games. Zero Dawn plays great, Forbidden West does not.

        At the bottom spec like the deck is, a two or three year refresh cadence is expected, unless they get to the point it hits in the middle of the performance window and has more leeway.

        • BluesF@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Yes, and that is exactly why having a low spec device as a common performance benchmark is useful. It extends the lifespan of low spec devices in general - at least if publishers think it’s worth targeting the playerbase.