I mean, is it really worth it to compile every single program that I install? Wouldn’t that be a waste of time? I am inclined to try it out but on the other hand idk

  • yum13241@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    Arch has great documentation, rolling release, and customizability, minus the compilation. Obviously, use Gentoo if you want to. But for advanced Linux users, I highly recommend Arch.

    • krissen@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I’ve heard good things about Arch. Indeed, I installed it on one of my boxes, where I specifically wanted to avoid a lot of compilations, besides being curious about it.

      Used it for a bit over a year know and… I don’t know, it hasn’t been as stable, and I’ve find using AUR more of a chore than custom ebuild repos. It’s probably great when you get used to it, but so far I still prefer Gentoo.

      It’s great, that there are several good distros for different use cases, and that we have the freedom to choose what suits us best!

      • yum13241@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        “it hasn’t been as stable” I say that’s bad luck. Maybe if I went to try Gentoo some bad source code might’ve gotten pushed and then I’d get a bad impression.

        Also, I only have access to potatoes. Also, I use the chaotic aur repo, otherwise I would’ve given up ages ago.