Clbull@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 8 months agoBlizzard locks you out of account if you don't agree to new terms; no ownership, forced arbitrationyoutu.beexternal-linkmessage-square114fedilinkarrow-up1912arrow-down115
arrow-up1897arrow-down1external-linkBlizzard locks you out of account if you don't agree to new terms; no ownership, forced arbitrationyoutu.beClbull@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 8 months agomessage-square114fedilink
minus-squareSTOMPYI@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up55arrow-down1·7 months agoSo i’m not a lawyer but isn’t there a law for unconsciability, When a contract is so one-sided, it’s obvious that me the signer has absolutely no rights.The entire contract is voided.
minus-squareKyrgizion@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up54arrow-down1·edit-21 month agoRemoved by mod
minus-squaregian @lemmy.grys.itlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19arrow-down1·7 months agoThat is true in US. In EU litigations cost are way lower and a single person could sue, win and not be financially broken. Problem is only that in any case what you pay for a lawyer is more than you win, so it make no sense to sue in any case.
minus-squareTigrisMorte@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up17arrow-down1·7 months agoAlmost like the Legal system is intentionally designed such that the wealthy are the only ones with any actual access.
minus-squareAatube@kbin.melroy.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down1·7 months agoI guess in return the signer gets the service?
minus-squarera1d3n@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up20arrow-down1·edit-27 months agoThe signer gets the service because they paid for it. Mostly these are changed after people already bought the stuff.
So i’m not a lawyer but isn’t there a law for unconsciability, When a contract is so one-sided, it’s obvious that me the signer has absolutely no rights.The entire contract is voided.
Removed by mod
That is true in US. In EU litigations cost are way lower and a single person could sue, win and not be financially broken.
Problem is only that in any case what you pay for a lawyer is more than you win, so it make no sense to sue in any case.
Almost like the Legal system is intentionally designed such that the wealthy are the only ones with any actual access.
I guess in return the signer gets the service?
The signer gets the service because they paid for it. Mostly these are changed after people already bought the stuff.