• Serinus@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    1 year ago

    the fur suit is the equivalent [of] leather and a ballgag

    I mean, no. It’s really not.

    I do get what you’re saying and generally agree otherwise. That one was just a bit much.

    • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      I agree. I’ve seen furries in public and while I find them odd, I never saw any of their costumes as inherently sexual.

        • yuriy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          except they don’t though, where are you coming up with this?

          say someone is attracted to women, right? is every female body they see gonna be viewed exclusively through a sexual lens?

          some people get kinky with ropes, are those inherently sexual too? where’s the line?

        • Azal@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Some do, many don’t. A fursuit is a costume, as a cosplayer in fandoms do, and I guarantee there are cosplayers that have sex in their costumes.

          Knowing quite a few fursuiters there’s less of them that want to have sex in suit because it’s hot as fuck, makes you a lot more clumsy, and those suits are expensive as hell as they’re custom made.