• Lvxferre
    link
    fedilink
    3024 days ago

    The problem is considerably smaller if you consider that the software is used by a lot more people than English speakers (both L1 and L2+). For these, “gimp” is not some sex stuff, but rather that critter chewing on a brush. And even for L2+, the word “gimp” is often missing from our vocabs.

    As others said in this thread, the actual problem holding GIMP back is called user interface. It has improved, but it’s still awful.

    • @Moonrise2473@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      1524 days ago

      Agree with this

      I am not a native speaker and I never associated gimp with a sex meaning, even if my vocabulary is pretty expanded.

      It could be called “DesirePix 2.0” or “SeductionStudio 4.0” but the main problem is that it gives a worse user experience than using Adobe Photoshop 5.0 on windows 95, on every single aspect. Features, speed, UI, ease of use, and so on

      • @Moonrise2473@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        724 days ago

        Disclaimer: it’s not that I’m denigrating the devs, making a program like gimp is super fucking hard and as a lousy programmer I could never be able to make it better. Ideally, it would need some talented designers to develop a more usable UI.

        I see comparisons to photopea, but that’s a UI clone of Photoshop and that is not really wanted. It also didn’t come with technical debt from the 90s