• @Wrench@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    171 month ago

    Except Republicans fucking love subsidies if it’s for their donors.

    Corn? Oil? Fracking? Tanks for police? Make it rain!

    The poors? Fuck them, let their kids starve. Ohh, and let’s take away their ability to prevent or terminate pregnancies too, so more kids can starve.

    • @disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      -9
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      If there’s money to be had, sure, they want a piece. Conservatives would rather a lower tax and no subsidies and let the free market shake things out. They align with Libertarians on economic policy. Minimal taxes and maximum free market with no purse for social programs or subsidies.

      • @Wrench@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        111 month ago

        Only if you buy their dating profile pic. What they do in reality is the opposite. Red states take a LOT more subsidies than blue.

        • @disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          -71 month ago

          Again, it’s not that they won’t accept them. Conservatives prefer limiting government in free enterprise. There would be no money for subsidies if the taxes were as low as they’d like them to be. There would also be no money for social services like welfare, SNAP, Medicaid, Medicare, emergency housing, etc.

            • @disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              -7
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              That’s the high social legislation I was referring to. That’s where they differ from Liberals and Libertarians alike. Conservatives support restrictive legislation on social liberties. Christian Nationalism is a great example.