“we have Dahir insaat at home” ass monorail

  • flan [they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 months ago

    if it’s on one rail you could have them pass each other without needing to build a second set of tracks or relying on sidings to exist

        • Maoo [none/use name]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          Oh God that’s even worse. Guaranteed collisions via an unnecessary slow-moving part that is assumed to always function correctly.

          Rail comes in pairs already so that you only have to build one engineered area, tunnel, bridge, etc. This is a bazinga idea.

          • Chronicon [they/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            if you read the article, the bar is a safety mechanism for the prototype/testing stage and would not be in place on the production run.

            these test models are equipped with extendible “catching devices” that keep them from tipping over in the event of a mishap

            • Maoo [none/use name]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 months ago

              Yes I read the article and that ambiguous language doesn’t challenge what I said.

              This is a really bad idea. The kind cooked up by academic transportation grifters looking to take a pile of money from the government to do a bad idea with the right buzzwords. This is how the bazinga industrial complex works.