• corbinOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    8 months ago

    The benefit is improved performance and a better user experience. The Chromium-based components of Steam (like the store) are slow in part because of that.

    • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      8 months ago

      Perhaps, but all of these things must be measured in the benefit to business. Does the performance between a 32-bit or 64-bit versions translate to a difference in sales? Are there user complaints sufficient that there is lost satisfaction to competitors large enough to offset the development and support burden from the investment in a 64 bit client? My guess is that the answer is “no” or Valve would have made this change already. These are the way businesses make these decisions.

      • Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        8 months ago

        He didn’t answer your first question. I get the feeling you’re right and he’s the author.

        • corbinOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          15
          ·
          8 months ago

          Yep, never tried to hide that.

      • systemglitch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        8 months ago

        Aside from this post I have never in my life heard one single person complain about 32vs64bit. It’s the most silly thing for him to be upset about.