• @harsh3466@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    793 months ago

    If only. It’d be a real April fool’s if Canonical announced they were abandoning snap and throwing their supory behind flatpak.

      • @Successful_Try543@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        93 months ago

        Having other 180° turnarounds in mind, e.g. Unity, which was nice on a netbook, or their display server (I don’t recall its name), would it be that surprising if this was real news? This makes it a really good April Fool’s joke.

        • @intrepid@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          113 months ago

          Their display server is Mir. They first chose Wayland. Everyone was excited and started putting their weight behind it. Then their NIH syndrome kicked in and they declared Mir, claiming that Wayland has a lot of deficiencies. Wayland devs contested it and explained why their complaints were wrong. But Canonical never bothered to reply. This irked everyone else and they stayed with Wayland. Eventually, Mir failed to achieve its goal and Canonical decided to convert it to just another Wayland compositor.

          • @jonne
            link
            133 months ago

            Canonical has wasted so much dev time trying to reinvent the wheel, only to go back to using the thing everyone else is using years later.

        • @acockworkorange@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          63 months ago

          Funny you should mention it:

          “After the initial resistance, some Linux users have started liking Snap, just as few people got attached to Unity. This is a scary situation for us. From Ubuntu One to Unity and Mir, we have abandoned projects in the past. We can do it again for the greater good.”

          Read the article, it’s really fun.