@robocall@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev • 3 months agoDad has the chops to be a project manager.lemmy.worldimagemessage-square92fedilinkarrow-up11.22Karrow-down17
arrow-up11.21Karrow-down1imageDad has the chops to be a project manager.lemmy.world@robocall@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev • 3 months agomessage-square92fedilink
minus-square@RonSijm@programming.devlinkfedilink49•3 months ago"OS support: The latest one” is not that bad of an requirement… If they complain like “why doesn’t this work on Windows Vista, on IE8” - you can just point to the specs and say you only support the latest OS. So basically you only support the latest Nightly Build of Ubuntu, since that’s the current latest OS
minus-square@nxdefiant@startrek.websitelinkfedilink15•edit-23 months agoYou don’t even need to support anything older than the last windows hot fix with requirements like that.
minus-square@lugal@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilink21•3 months agoWhy support windows when you can argue that linux has a newer OS?
minus-square@nxdefiant@startrek.websitelinkfedilink11•3 months agoI am humbled by your chess of many D’s.
minus-square@Socsa@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilink1•3 months agoThis is completely reasonable, but requires significant CI infrastructure
"OS support: The latest one” is not that bad of an requirement…
If they complain like “why doesn’t this work on Windows Vista, on IE8” - you can just point to the specs and say you only support the latest OS.
So basically you only support the latest Nightly Build of Ubuntu, since that’s the current latest OS
You don’t even need to support anything older than the last windows hot fix with requirements like that.
Why support windows when you can argue that linux has a newer OS?
I am humbled by your chess of many D’s.
This is completely reasonable, but requires significant CI infrastructure