• ricecake@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    4 months ago

    No it doesn’t. 😊

    The outcome can be total nonsense and it still subverts the expectation that 1) you get tea, 2) the outcome makes sense.

    If they had available footage of a stream of puppies being forcefully ejected from the replicator, that would also work.

    But nothing else. Only the explosion and the puppy hose work.

    • Dnn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      OK. So, let’s just assume, just theoretically, someone in your future let’s you know you don’t have a great sense of humor, feel free to come back and read those comments again.

        • Dnn@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          I never said I don’t get it, just implied it isn’t funny. And it obviously isn’t to many people here judging by the votes.

          By using fancy terms and feeling the need to link an explanation (the link is broken, by the way) you now give it a self-opinionated flair. Maybe you’re the weird one.

          • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            4 months ago

            You think non-sequiter is a fancy term?

            I’m sorry that I explained a joke to someone who said they didn’t get it.

            I suppose the logical thing to do if you don’t think a joke is funny is to complain about it in the comments though, particularly at people who didn’t make the joke who just explained it to someone else.

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non_sequitur_(literary_device)

            There’s the fixed link. Not sure why the encoding went funky.