• ExLisper@linux.community
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    143
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    If anyone would care to read the article it’s more about companies making more high end cars and running low stocks than making cars bigger. They reduced stock during the pandemic and discovered that they can make more money selling fewer cars with maxed out specs than a lot of base models. They simply don’t have base models on stock now and people still have to buy cars so profits are soaring. Basically they made everyone depend on cars by killing public transport and are now milking it hard. Because what are you going to do? Work from home?

    • jonne
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      49
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Good thing China isn’t ready to flood the market with millions of cheap electric cars. This short term profit is going to end up biting them in the ass real quick. Although I guess they know they’ll just get bailed out, so there’s no reason to innovate.

      • JeffKerman1999@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        Not to worry: protectionism will take take of the competition. Just like they did with the Japanese manufacturers…

        • GhostFence@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          Cheap labor Conservatives destroyed protectionism. Part of why we’re in this giant economic mess is because offshoring wiped our middle class off the map like the Chixclub meteor.

        • jonne
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          5 months ago

          Domestically there’s still Tesla, although I guess they decided to do a stupid big truck as well.

      • frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        Most of those Chinese cars wouldn’t meet US safety regs. Getting them up to that level would put them closer to cost parity.

        • jonne
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          5 months ago

          They sell them in the EU, which has stricter safety regulations. If they set out to do it, they’ll flood the market and get the traditional manufacturers in trouble.

          • frezik@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            5 months ago

            EU allows all sorts of stuff that isn’t allowed in the US. Believe it or not, US safety regs are generally higher than the EU (for passengers, anyway). The Ariel Atom, for example, needs some hoop jumping to make it US street legal, but can be driven without issue much of the EU.

          • mightyfoolish@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            5 months ago

            Wow, I didn’t realize there were Chinese cars on the European market. Are the cars being received well? Are there major issues with them and if there are major issues, does price still make them worth it?

            • ChrisLicht@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              They’re surprisingly good, particularly BYD cars, in my experience.

              Americans’ vehicles tend to be huge, wildly inefficient for their daily usage, and they throw off externalities like pedestrian and cyclist risks, road damage, and support for countries who use our gas spending to make the world less liberal.

              VW, Honda, Toyota, and Datsun capitalized on American vehicle bloat to build massive, multinational companies with products in every segment. The Chinese are going to ruin our domestic manufacturers, once they decide to build bridgehead plants here.

              Today, I’m driving an Acura that is made in Marysville, Ohio. Not assembled; it is substantively made here in the States. And, the chain reaction that led to Honda, a Japanese company, exporting profits made from American productivity in 2024, started with the Big Three making massively bloated, inefficient, expensive, poorly designed cars, leaving a gap in the market that foreign companies exploited with right-sized, efficient, affordable, reliable vehicles, starting in the ‘60s and exploding with the ‘73 oil crisis.

              I don’t have time to find a link, but there have been studies that demonstrate that the exact choices being made by American manufacturers today—to not fully serve the bottom of the market—sow the seeds of their own future declines in the middle and upper markets.

              • mightyfoolish@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                I truly feel car manufacturers are doing everything in their power to make sure that I personally regret every car decision I make. I hope a new comer starts at a low price point and eventually takes their higher margin stuff as well.

        • mightyfoolish@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          My biggest worry is that once/if the Chinese make cars “good enough for the US market”, all car companies lobby for worse consumer protections since those regulations no longer keep new competitors out of the market.

          • frezik@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            I’d be OK with it, but with some caveats. Many US safety regs (and some pollution regs, as well) push things towards larger vehicles in indirect ways. Japanese Kei cars can be perfectly good for city use–not for US highways, but a lot of driving doesn’t need to go there–but they would never pass US safety regs. And you don’t need to get much bigger than a Kei to have something that works for US highways. Big is only safer for passengers, not for people outside the vehicle.

            So if it comes in the context of also getting smaller cars on the road, that would be fine.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          Not really, the big problem is tariffs. You have to do at least final assembly in the US to avoid that.

    • GhostFence@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      That’s a lot of words to say “Cartel”. Car…tel… get it?

      I’m here all day, folks! 👍

      Here’s a hint: the automakers are doing great. By essentially coordinating an industry-wide production cut, the pandemic gave manufacturers power to demand mind-boggling prices for fewer cars, leading to record profits. As consumers adjusted their expectations, executives saw an opportunity to establish a lucrative new normal. Low inventory is an “opportunity to drive strong margins”, GM’s CEO, Mary Barra, told shareholders in 2022. Ford’s CEO, Jim Farley, went even further, declaring: “I want to make it extremely clear to everyone: we are going to run our business with a lower day supply than we have had in the recent past because that’s good for our company.”

      Also see: collusion… market manipulation… fauxflation.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yet another point in the argument for a government corporation that makes basic shit and provides basic services across the board.

        • GhostFence@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          “But muh nationalization socialism! Next thing you know we’ll all be in gulags!” - some trailer park right wing rube reading this right now.

    • maness300@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      I’ve noticed this trend in other businesses, as well.

      They’ve realized it’s more profitable to screw over fewer people harder than it is to try to appease more customers with better deals. The most notable example of this to me would be the fast food industry.

      It’s a win-win, because they get to expend fewer resources due to fewer customers and they make more money with each transaction.

      Fuck greed and anyone who supports it.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      To extend and clarify a bit, if you want a base model they don’t have, you have to pay a delivery fee. At which point you might as well buy the higher trim on the lot.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Well not officially. At least not where I’ve been car shopping before. But that might explain the 2,000 dollars in dealer add ons they refuse to sell the car without.