@CombatWombatEsq@lemmy.world to Fuck Cars@lemmy.worldEnglish • 6 months agoIt’s time to ban ‘right-on-red’www.fastcompany.commessage-square219fedilinkarrow-up1291arrow-down1146
arrow-up1145arrow-down1external-linkIt’s time to ban ‘right-on-red’www.fastcompany.com@CombatWombatEsq@lemmy.world to Fuck Cars@lemmy.worldEnglish • 6 months agomessage-square219fedilink
minus-square@AA5B@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish8•6 months agoPersonally I do think that’s the real reason behind right on red: saving money for towns who don’t want to invest in more complicated traffic lights. Trading increased injuries for saving a little money
minus-square@jerkface@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglish7•6 months agoIt costs nothing to make people wait for a green.
minus-square@duffman@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish-2•6 months agoYou just listed the cost. Time. Another is reduced thouroughput/increased traffic.
minus-square@jerkface@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglish6•edit-26 months agoDude. Fucking context: saving money for towns who don’t want to invest in more complicated traffic lights
minus-square@Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglish1•6 months agoIt’ll cost them the election, that’s what
Personally I do think that’s the real reason behind right on red: saving money for towns who don’t want to invest in more complicated traffic lights. Trading increased injuries for saving a little money
It costs nothing to make people wait for a green.
You just listed the cost. Time. Another is reduced thouroughput/increased traffic.
Dude. Fucking context:
It’ll cost them the election, that’s what