• FinnFooted@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Society needs to codify these rules into law though otherwise bad actors break those rules. When a right wing activist supreme court removes these protections, people get hurt. But, a store like this isnt doing this to hurt people, it’s to make a statement that the far-rights own discrimination can backfire on them. It’s a form of protest and a statement, not true bigotry. Its like using the flying spaghetti monster tactic to push legislation to be more strict on religion. These people are trying ro show that regulation on business to prevent denying goods and services is important for everyone, not just minorities the the right hates.

    • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think I’m confused. I’m pretty sure the court case that the supreme Court just ruled on proved the opposite.

    • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think I’m confused. I’m pretty sure the court case that the supreme Court just ruled on proved the opposite.

      • CeruleanRuin@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’re right in that the current state of the country does not actually reflect the ideals it professes to be based on, and this Supreme Court ruling is proof of that.