Broadcom is laying off 1,267 Palo Alto-based VMware workers following its acquisition of the company

Chip manufacturer Broadcom wrote the latest chapter in the long story of return-to-office tensions between bosses and employees.

After completing its $69 billion acquisition of cloud computing company VMWare, Broadcom CEO Hock Tan issued a direct order to his new employees about where they must work. “If you live within 50 miles of an office, you get your butt in here,” he told the workers of previously remote-friendly VMWare.

The comments came during a meeting Tan hosted on Tuesday after the merger between the two companies officially closed, following approval from Chinese regulators. Like many other executives, Tan cited in-person work’s benefits to collaboration and company culture. “Collaboration is important and a key part of sustaining a culture with your peers, with your colleagues,” he said.

  • 0xF21Ddeleted by creator
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    deleted by creator

    • netburnr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      3 years ago

      Everything is going to be core based for licensing, and if you aren’t in their top 600 customers you will receive worst support. Both of those things have been publicly stated.

      • 0xF21Ddeleted by creator
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        deleted by creator

        • aard@kyu.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 years ago

          For workstation there hasn’t been a need to use VMWare for over a decade now, if you’re on Linux. Server side, if you needed live migration you had a reason to stick with VMWare - but that also should’ve been solved about a decade ago. Pretty much the only two excuses for still using VMWare infrastructure are “it’s old infra, and we don’t really have the time to migrate away from it” or “our ops team is too incompetent to handle anything else”

          • 0xF21Ddeleted by creator
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            deleted by creator

    • SheeEttin@lemmy.worldBanned
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 years ago

      Now? The writing was on the wall years ago. Support has already taken a nosedive, and they’ve basically all but stopped selling anything except to the biggest customers.

      • 0xF21Ddeleted by creator
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        deleted by creator

      • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 years ago

        My biggest qualm with switching to proxmox is how painful it is to convert VMs. We have some VMs with multiple TBs of storage.

        In order to move you have to install the drivers first, shut down the VM, copy the files over (slowly), convert the VM (takes forever even on a 6 drive NVME raid array), before creating a new VM with matching settings then booting and it finally will work. And if you forgot the drivers then you have to find a storage controller that works, boot up, install the driver, then shut down and change the settings.

        • Taleya@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 years ago

          well that’s gonna be a beast you face anyway - it’d also happen if you had to implement your worst case DRP.

          I’m not saying it’s gonna be hassle free, but uh, you’re migrating your infrastructure. It’s gonna be a big job.

          • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 years ago

            VMware makes it easy. You can live migrate a physical (or virtual) machine to VMware. Then just shut down the physical machine and turn on the VM. But apparently nothing like this exists for proxmox.

        • SapphironZA@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 years ago

          You can skip the disk convert step and mount the vmdk files directly. Then after bootup you can use the move disk feature to live convert the disk type.

      • SapphironZA@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 years ago

        I tend to draw the line around the 500 VMs mark and whether you use hyper-converged hardware. Above 500 VMs you are likely to be using dedicated storage, where XCP-ng will scale more easily.

        Proxmox makes hyper-converged management simpler than XCP-ng and can handle more complex networking setups out of the box.

        But there is a pretty large overlap between their capabilities.

      • 0xF21Ddeleted by creator
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        deleted by creator