• 0x4E4FOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    You resign them from their positions because those leaders will not be the only ones in the country/world, more like a part of a council.

    I have thought about this as well… this is the best I could come up with.

      • 0x4E4FOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The council, the rest of the people in it.

        • BilliamBoberts@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          That concerns me because that creates a conflict of interest if the only people who can invite or remove people from the council are other members of said council. We see in the real world that breeds nepotism and corruption and makes non-violent policy change nearly impossible. Wouldn’t it be better to allow the people to choose council members and remove them by vote when necessary?

          • 0x4E4FOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah, I see your point of view. May be better like that… or a combo of votes maybe (the people and the council).