• ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    8 months ago

    But uBlock origin has a light version they expect to work with V3

    It just “kinda” works. It cannot nearly load all the network filters that it would normally use.

      • Madis@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        7 months ago

        Yes, it blocks ads, and likely the YouTube ones too. The current problem with YouTube is just their anti-adblocker which needs very frequent filter updates and unlike MV2, filter updates in MV3 need the update of the entire extension (think approval periods etc).

        • ExLisper@linux.community
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          7 months ago

          That was my understanding. People talk about this change like it’s going to disable adblock extensions completely which is clearly not the case. So far no one really explained what the actual impact will be. Do you know that? I see youtube ads might be harder to block. Anything else?

          • mihor@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Yeah, I would like to know that as well.

            Although if updating the adblocker’s list is not instant, as with wm2, it is basically a losing race with Google, since they can change the ad domains even before the adblocker update is applied.

            • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 months ago

              Or worse, since the adblocker no longer has direct access, they can just set chrome to ignore it’s requests/changes when it benefits them.

          • ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            Oh fear not, limiting filter list updates to addon updates is a huge problem. For those users who rarely restart their browsers it’s even bigger of a problem: updating the addon (for the up to date filter lists) also means that all of the already loaded websites will lose the filters until you reload them, which is both not obvious to be needed and very painful, when you are using your browser for other things than consuming.

            Also, does that also mean that custom filter lists are impossible anymore?

            Besides these, also take into account that approval of addon updates can take a long time, quite often days, while the filters need to be updated more often (once or twice a day) for websites to not break for the majority of the users.

            Yes, thinking about it, I still confidently think that chrome’s changes are unacceptable and are dealbreakers, and google is very clearly trying to curb content blockers with whatever tools available. Fortunately I don’t have to use that garbage anywhere.

      • ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Not really. In some cases it is able to, but as I said, ublock cannot load it’s filters, and so it can filter out much less things. Don’t forget that ublock does not only block ads, but disruptive popups and obsessive data mining too. With this change of chrome, it is simply unable to do that reliably.