Who’d have thought BoredApe NFTs would be such an actual eyesore?

  • homicidalrobot@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    It’s not for anyone with a shred of sense. Lighting aside, anyone still being conned by the NFT image market is unfortunately probably willfully ignorant, impossibly stubborn, and unable to learn from their mistakes or the mistakes of others. There are plenty of working ways to tokenize images for an actual purpose, blockchain verification is worthless for individual images and literally always was.

    • rhizophonic@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      The year is 2043, and Chumlee has been uploaded to the Metaverse.

      “I remember those,” Chumlee said, his voice echoing through the virtual space. “Let me run this by my valuation expert, the all-knowing singularity.”

      A moment later, Chumlee’s eyes widened in surprise. “Fourteen trillion?” he repeated.

      “That’s what it says,” the singularity replied.

      Chumlee shook his head. “I can’t believe it. I’ll give you two.”

    • cricket98@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      maybe they’re just having fun. People purchase status items all the time and no one has a problem with it. There is nothing fundamentally different between showing off your 100k monkey picture with showing off your 100k watch.

      • homicidalrobot@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Take less than five minutes out of your day to compare the impact of a rolex watch with the impact of a blockchain interaction. It sounds like you don’t understand how wildly different those two things are, either physically (one does not exist, the other does) or in an environmental context (one uses grid power with every verification, one is mechanical). “Buying status symbols for fun” would make a good album title for a boy band a decade ago.

        • cricket98@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          8 months ago

          Something physically existing or not is not what makes a status symbol. Are you implying something about energy consumption of blockchains? The network these are on (ethereum) no longer uses PoW mining, so the energy argument does not work here.