Who’d have thought BoredApe NFTs would be such an actual eyesore?

  • ryan@the.coolest.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    133
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Yuga Labs says it’s currently investigating reports of impeded vision and skin/eye injuries believed to be caused by unprotected exposure to UV lights during ApeFest 2023.

    Jesus Christ.

    Anyway, I’m… Actually somewhat impressed they’re still having Monkey PNG meetups. I kind of assumed every NFT was a scam but this one is just a very expensive buy-in to a cryptonerd club, I guess.

    • BURN@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      47
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      I also kinda figured the people who are into the Monkey PNGs aren’t exactly the ones who go to meetups

      • sab@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        8 months ago

        I think it’s more that they tend not to get invited to non-monkey PNG meetups. Possibly in part due to their habit of turning any meetup into a monkey PNG one.

      • radix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        8 months ago

        Have to go out there and put in the work to proselytize their Lord and Savior Blockchain.

        • db2@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          8 months ago

          Blockchain and NFT are not synonymous. All Camrys are cars but not all cars are Camrys.

          • fubo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            17
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            8 months ago

            Eh, the relationship isn’t quite the same as that one.

            It’s more like the relationship between a video game framework and a video game. Pygame, Unity, or Godot are not games you can play; they’re tools for programmers to build games with.

            Similarly, blockchain is a technology for implementing scams; NFTs are one specific scam.

            • db2@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              14
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              8 months ago

              Similarly, blockchain is a technology for implementing scams

              By that logic the US dollar is a means for facilitating crime. It’s certainly used for that, a lot, but that isn’t what it is for. A blockchain is for keeping an immutable and verifiable record by way of cryptography. That there are a lot of scams doesn’t change what it is.

            • abhibeckert@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              blockchain is a technology for implementing scams; NFTs are one specific scam.

              No. Blockchain is a technology where you generate a hash of an event that happened - e.g. garage door opened at 7:00am, and then you hash another event - garage door closed at 7:02am, continue doing that for years, hundreds of thousands of garage door movements, and just by looking at the last hash in the event chain, you can verify, in less than a millisecond, that two copies of the blockchain are identical (e.g. the working data set and a backup copy of it).

              It’s just a simple and efficient data integrity checker and it’s shit for scams - because there’s no way to hide your tracks when the feds investigate you… as Sam Bankman-Fried just learned.

              Pretty soon the scammers will realise they’re better off with cash and paper books which can easily be doctored (or simply misplaced - “sorry your honor, we can’t find records for July 2021 anywhere!”).

              • LemmysMum@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                8 months ago

                Yep. It’s hard to feel sorry for anyone who got grifted, who knew that buying the equivalent of a graffiti’d up CVS receipt would turn out to be worthless.

      • db2@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Sure they are, they’re just always nervous Chris Hansen is going to be there already.

    • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      8 months ago

      I kind of assumed every NFT was a scam

      This one hasn’t yet proven that it isn’t, just that the people who bought in had a lot of disposable income to begin with.

    • IndiBrony@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      8 months ago

      Sunken cost fallacy at this point. They have to keep believing it’s a thing otherwise they have to face the reality that they were duped.

      • Stantana@lemmy.sambands.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        Or the opposite, they know it’s dropping like a stone so they try to keep it relevant for potential buyers to offload it to?

    • EnderMB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Sunk cost, I guess. A lot of people in the crypto industry are still here because they don’t want to admit that they were wrong about it.