• @Farnswirth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -12
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    There are two major concerns I have with UBI.

    1. It’s highly inflationary.

    2. It fosters dependency, and it’s an economic-political death spiral. People on UBI vote for those who support higher UBI. Inflation increases due to increased monetary velocity. People demand higher UBI due to cost of living increases. Votes go to those who promise higher UBI, etc. The cycle continues until you’re wiping your ass with currency or some form of CBDC is implemented to stop the bleeding.

    • @PeleSpirit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      368 months ago

      It fosters dependency

      You’re going to have to source that. There is no cycle of dependency, lol. Everyone making it above survival level probably won’t even spur them to vote. These aren’t people rolling in money, it’s 12k per year.

      • @Chunk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -18 months ago

        Giving everyone 12k/year doesn’t foster dependency? Dude I make enough to not be homeless but if I had an extra 12k I’d spend it and my lifestyle would inflate. That’s dependency. I depend on it to live a nicer life.

    • @Eheran@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      118 months ago

      Do we have any sort of previous example of this happening? Was this ever tested? If no: a test is seemingly well worth it.

      • @PeleSpirit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        148 months ago

        This isn’t directed at you, this is for the other dude, but also answers your question a little. The entire US was given checks during the pandemic, did it make you lazy?

        • @cricket97@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -18 months ago

          There’s a big difference when its guaranteed over a period of time. Then you can actually feel justified in quitting whatever job you have since you know the money will keep coming in.

        • Bob Robertson IX
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -28 months ago

          The entire US was given checks during the pandemic, did it make you lazy?

          I mean, I spent a year wearing sweat pants and hardly leaving my house.

          • @PeleSpirit@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            68 months ago

            Because you were rolling in checks or because it was unhealthy to do so? Having worked full-time and part time as a freelancer, job burnout and needing recovery isn’t laziness.

            • Bob Robertson IX
              link
              fedilink
              English
              28 months ago

              It was a joke… I was still working full time, just from home. And I didn’t go anywhere because there was a pandemic going on and I didn’t want to be around people. But the fact that I was 100% in sweatpants and lounging around the house for a year did feel lazy, but had nothing to do with the checks coming in from the government.

        • @Gigan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -78 months ago

          Fuck yeah it did. I was making the same on unemployment as I would have being at work. I wanted to stay laid off.

          • @PeleSpirit@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            48 months ago

            What you wanted to do and what you did are 2 different things. You’re overworked and probably not doing a job that you want to do. That isn’t laziness, that’s job unsatisfaction.

            • @Gigan@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -18 months ago

              Yeah, but that probably applies to a lot of people. Why would anyone choose to do all the bullshit (but necessary) jobs if they can get paid the same for sitting at home?

    • @centof@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      58 months ago
      1. It’s highly inflationary.
      1. False. It is only inflationary if the the government prints money to fund it. If instead the government funds it by cutting unnecessary spending or increasing tax revenue in some way than it is not inflationary. There is the same amount of money in circulation but it is just moving between hands instead of staying in a bank account.
    • snooggums
      link
      fedilink
      48 months ago

      So to summarize other people’s points, evidence shows that those concerns are not outcomes of UBI so there is no need to be worried.

    • I'm back on my BS 🤪
      link
      fedilink
      English
      18 months ago
      1. It’s highly inflationary.

      I think this is a great example of what rich people think of us. This user would prefer that people stay homeless rather than cut back on their own luxuries so that others could have a more decent basic standard of living. Those with stable basic housing feel like they’re living the normal life they have earned, while a homeless person is someone that doesn’t want to put in the work to carry themselves. The wealthy think the same way about the middle class: we want vacation days, adequate healthcare, a proper justice system, and decent wages/fair business market without earning it. However, a person with a 1 bedroom apartment they can call home is a king to a homeless person.

      1. It fosters dependency, and it’s an economic-political death spiral. People on UBI vote for those who support higher UBI.

      Here, we see the privilege. They argue that it would foster dependency because the poor would vote for better standards of living rather than contribute to society. To think this way, we have to ignore that someone cannot meaningfully contribute to society without adequate housing and stability. We would also have to ignore our own hypocrisy in that we argue that our standard of living is dependent on the exploitation of the homeless.

      These are the very same arguments that the wealthy elite use. If they pay more taxes, then the poor will slippery slope the vote by electing politicians that continue to increase taxes on the rich, while also becoming dependent on that revenue.

      I am in no way attacking this user. It’s a common mentality across the world. Instead, I’m using their comment to point out how this mentality works regardless of social class: 1) my efforts have created my wealth, while everyone else that is poorer just doesn’t work to earn it, and 2) helping the lazy poorer people makes them dependent on my work. Repeat these arguments in some fashion all the way down to the poorest person on Earth 🔁