• kinther@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    462
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    11 months ago

    It’s a tech company that is burning itself to a ground. Hard to take your eyes off of a slow moving car crash.

    • PlasmaDistortion@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      97
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Sometimes it’s fun to just sit back and watch platforms combust due to their own arrogance.

    • Ysysel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      58
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      11 months ago

      Never understood why we call them tech companies to be honest. There is nothing technologically interesting at twitter. And if there is… it is never the subject.

      • 9point6@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        11 months ago

        So I think the main thing is scale—they’re tech companies (in the category they’re in) because of the engineering required to build & maintain something that operates at the scale they do

        And IMO at least in the early years it was pretty impressive what Twitter was capable of in terms of technology.

      • ElectroNeutrino@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        If I remember, tech companies are generally those whose primary products are digitally based. And technology these days has essentially become synonymous woth the internet.

    • WarmSoda@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      I’m still waiting for any article that talks about the tech that Twitter is supposed to be so famous for.

      • visak@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        What Twitter did well I think was handle the non-trvial problems of scale, and did a fairly credible job of content moderation. I can find fault with a lot of how they handled that but they did honestly try. Becoming the dominant platform is always largely luck, but had they not adequately handled scale and content they would not have lasted for so long. Content moderation is a people, process, and technology problem.

        Twitter like it or not has been pivotal for connecting people around the world especially those with less developed infrastructure. The Arab Spring events would not have happened without it. Which is why I think the Saudis were happy to give Elon money. They knew he’d either make it more friendly for them, or kill it and they’d have a hold on him because of the money he owes.

        • T156@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          11 months ago

          Content moderation is a people, process, and technology problem.

          Their content filtering/categorisation was also quite good. They’re one of the few sites I can think of that had a bit more clarification than a basic “NSFW/Sensitive Content” tag, even if it came rather late, so if something was marked correctly, you could get an idea of what kind of NSFW content it was, without unblurring the image.