• Dr. Moose
    link
    fedilink
    English
    18
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Honestly, it’s totally fair imo.
    People who hadn’t experience before-Spotify times can’t really appreciate the value. I’d love all information to be free and all but just the indexing and data hosting service would be worth 11$/mo. People being a bit silly here ngl. If you can’t afford 11$ for this service then honestly you either don’t need it or you need re-evaluate your budgeting.

    • @Caesium@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      611 months ago

      yeah the price increase isn’t too awful for me. I use Spotify all the time so premium is totally worth it for me. and I know rates aren’t that high but I’m happy to know I’m actually paying the people I listen to somewhat!

    • @whatsarefoogee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      211 months ago

      Ah yes, poor people and people living on minimum wage don’t need music. And if they really needed it, they would just skip a meal.

      Indexing and data hosting is worth $11 per month? Music uses very little space and bandwidth. Listening to 3 hours every day for a month ends up being around 10gb of bandwidth. If they were using expensive on-demand AWS bandwidth, that would cost them 50 cents. They aren’t, they have edge caches all over and almost certainly pay less than 10 cents.

      • @Squirrel@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        43
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Don’t… need… music…? There are plenty of free streaming options, or even the damn radio. Premium Spotify is far from the only option.

        Being able to listen to anything you want whenever you please is 100% a luxury – and one that wasn’t available until pretty recently.

        • @assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          211 months ago

          I really wonder about the age of the posters. I remember when the norm for music was $1 a song, which very quickly became $1.29. Spotify is so incredibly dirt cheap compared to that. But if people didn’t experience that heyday of $1 per song, they’re looking at this from a completely different perspective.

      • Dr. Moose
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1911 months ago

        As if piracy, free youtube etc. doesn’t exist. If you can’t afford 11$/mo and can’t afford to invest time to get around it then you really have bigger problems to complain about like lack of social security and wealth distribution. Complaining about this just appears like a comical waste of energy tbh.

        • @gengar@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -111 months ago

          Not everyone wants to listen to music illegally? And not everyone has unlimited data or can afford it for youtube/etc. Wealth distribution and a lack of social security are huge problems but like, bro it’s not a good look to criticize working class folks for (rightfully) complaining about yet another round of inflation.

      • wanderingmagus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1011 months ago

        Arr me hearties, thar be more ways than one to score yonder plunder.

    • @Carter@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      111 months ago

      Eh I find music streaming services to be massively overpriced. Second hand CDs are dirt cheap and offer better quality than Spotify does.