https://fiveable.me/key-terms/ap-psych-revised/authoritarian-figures
Having authority over most of the subjects means being an authoritarian figure amongst those subjects. How much of an authoritarian a leader is, is another question. When I said “authority versus people”, again, I quite clearly meant voices of people versus voices of prime ministers and presidents who probably have different dealings going on.
The word “figure” plays a rather important role, as I never said “authoritarians”.
Please re-read my comment. I don’t know what else to tell you.
Then maybe obviously I meant it as “authority”, not “dictatorship”? What people want versus what the higher ups want. Police is also authority. That word has multiple definitions my dude. Context matters.
People (note that I’m saying people, not whatever authoritarian figure you simp for) are celebrating this, from Brazil, to Colombia, and in Venezuela. Get a grip.
Are you seriously asking why EU sides with US instead of Maduro regime?
So far I see only Russia, Iran and China defending Maduro.
Are you confusing military alliance with unions? Isn’t US essentially a union?
Much of the modern science was discovered by pattern finding, which is where AI actually excels.
EDIT: By AI, I do not mean language models.
Communism does not exist. I consider myself a leftie but I don’t believe in communism, it has never worked and will never work.
What lefties actually believe in (including those who think communism can work) are social systems (part of socialism, which looks like communism, but that’s the difference - balance versus extremity). China’s social systems are supposedly very good, but they’re still capitalists (which isn’t necessarily bad if the government does it’s job like in most of EU and according to many - China)
charged with non-consent digital penetration
What does that even mean?
Why does every fucking topic, no matter how far it is from US, ends up with someone ranting about US?
For the first time ever in my life, I see someone claiming that China is left-wing. Left and authoritarian are usually at the opposite spectrums.
Honestly, not worth my time.
I’m not going to be your assistant in searching for stuff, but it goes something along these lines if internal attack happens - Article 1 is invoked. If whatever happened is not resolved peacefully, article 4 is invoked. Everyone gathers around and reminds the defender that NATO and Article 5 is linked to United Charters, and that (4-2?) quite clearly puts that into words (about inner conflicts), then everyone finished their high end meal and goes home.
Lmao we have a NATO expert here
TBH I sometimes bombard a family member of mine with questions, who’s an officer in army that’s under NATO.
GDP
But what about real life economics? Do you think Russia can afford less military buildup for 1 million versus US?
Because other articles already clarified that. If one law says “drinking is illegal”, another law does not need to say “drinking while being with friends is illegal”
It normally goes 1…2…3…, so if 1 already says something, 5 does not need to repeat something about being exclusively external.
This meme itself feels like AI slop. Also, as a dual user, AI is really not that prelevant on Windows, as opposed to my android phone. Not sure how things are on iPhone, but I heard apple intelligence is going “great”
That’s literally false, go and read article 5. It explicitly says external threats, not internal. In this case, Article 1 applies, which is actually about internal conflicts., but it simply says that any conflicts should be resolved peacefully, not that other members have any obligation to get involved.
I heard about bombs and Maduro, but oil is new. How are they even accomplishing that? Is US taking over their fields?