Upon reflecting I recognize now what the bad thing I said was.

To be clear, I’m just an idiot and don’t think carefully enough about what I’m saying or typing until it’s already out of my head.

I wasn’t trying to be discriminatory or exclusionary. I’m sorry everyone. I won’t bother you again.

Yes. It would be bad enough if they just briefly touched me to grab my attention, but often they would keep their hand on my forearm while speaking to me.

I apologize, I have a bad habit of not reading the rules (or noticing which sub I’m in, I came in from the ‘All’ feed).

I’ve just now read the rules, and it definitely says that only women can post, but it was less clear about if men would be welcome to comment (based on your comment it seems like maybe we’re not? [I have ASD, so I often need things spelled out for me explicitly, I’m not trying to be pedantic])

I’m sorry if I’m intruding, that was not my intention. If this is a safe space I’ll gladly see myself out.

Actually I’m now realizing that I’ve seen a few of those happen (I’ve seen the smiling one a lot actually), and have become somewhat desensitized, so they fall into a category of “upsetting but not surprising”.

I think the hand thing threw me for a bit of a loop because that’s some cartoon wolf shit

Perhaps a Dali would be prudent for this dystopian hellscape

Dudes fucking do that?!?

I used to be a bartender (I’m a cis-man), and I would get upset when a customer touched my forearm (multiple genders did this)

What the fuck is wrong with people

There’s likely a place online where you could have a custom case manufactured.

You could choose the artwork and know that it’s not AI

I think RedBubble offers them (you could also choose another human artist if you don’t want to create your own. Most of the designs on there can go on a phone case.

Sanders is just a confused old man.

His approach would be correct if AI was actually what the techno fascists say it is

It’s basically just like a version of Smarter Child that gets shit wrong all the time tho

The distinction is that computer hardware and simple programs are often well designed.

They also don’t get constantly anthropomorphized because they actually serve a function and can do the things they are advertised as being able to do.

AI is not well designed, and can not do the things it is advertised as being able to do. That’s precisely why they have to lie and make up stories about how scary and spooky it is.

Anyone with a rudimentary understanding of computers ain’t shook

Oh shit, I didn’t even realize Mapquest was still in the game

Thanks for the recommendation, I’ll look into that one

I think this is another intentional misrepresentation by the LLM mongers.

LLMs are not intelligent. They cannot do things that they have not been trained to do.

“Collusion” implies that the alleged agents acted with intention, that is not something an LLM is capable of. They are just using semantic trickery.

They’ve also ruined Google Maps by attempting to “optimize” it with AI

I use a navigation app constantly for work.

A month or two ago Google Maps started doing this thing where it would take me to the incorrect address on the same street as the address I was actually looking for.

Yesterday I put in an address, and it named the destination pin the correct address, but the pin wasn’t even on the same side of the city as the street I knew I was going to.

It used to work flawlessly. What the fuck are they thinking?

Anyway, I deleted that shit. Using Apple Maps until I find a FOSS navigation app I like.

deleted by creator

The just desserts might be served after the bailout

Little filter sounds preferable to the big filter

People dying because they blindly followed the advice of an LLM is kind of like natural selection.

I assume the selection will become more rapid as the consequences of cognitive offloading begin to manifest.

It’s not possible the way they’re trying to do it, no question.

You could make a flimsy argument that it would be possible in some way, but the way that they’ve chosen to approach it is 100% not viable.

To be clear, they did the Test at the same distance.

They didn’t mention the tumbling thing, but I assume that’s just because it’s a higher level concept than the demographic the video was designed for would be familiar with. (I don’t really have any knowledge on that aspect myself, not trying to say I do).

As far as where the bullet hit, I’m going just off of the video and official narrative. In the video it looks like he’s having a fencing response, which would indicate that he was hit with force and not just glanced/grazed.

In the official narrative they claim that the bullet got lodged in one of his vertebrae and stopped because his neck was “abnormally resilient”, or because “that’s what god wanted” depending on who you ask.

Yeah, I’m no ballistics expert myself, but if you look up videos of a ballistic Test dummy getting shot in the neck at that range with that caliber bullet, it appears that (if the details of the official story were true) his head would have likely entirely detached from his body.