• 0 Posts
  • 83 Comments
Joined 11 个月前
cake
Cake day: 2025年1月25日

help-circle




  • I’m being a bit extra but…

    Your statement:

    The article headline is wildly misleading, bordering on being just a straight up lie.

    The article headline:

    A Developer Accidentally Found CSAM in AI Data. Google Banned Him For It

    The general story in reference to the headline:

    • He found csam in a known AI dataset, a dataset which he stored in his account.
    • Google banned him for having this data in his account.
    • The article mentions that he tripped the automated monitoring tools.

    The article headline is accurate if you interpret it as

    “A Developer Accidentally Found CSAM in AI Data. Google Banned Him For It” (“it” being “csam”).

    The article headline is inaccurate if you interpret it as

    “A Developer Accidentally Found CSAM in AI Data. Google Banned Him For It” (“it” being “reporting csam”).

    I read it as the former, because the action of reporting isn’t listed in the headline at all.

    ___











  • I don’t think we’re going to get someone to the left of Kamala for the next few presidents. All the protest voters helped our country choose hard mode, and a lot of them are trying to rationalize it in any way that doesn’t make them feel like they played a part in such a close election.

    We have Trump because more people voted for Trump, and lots of people didn’t vote at all. You could blame Biden or Kamala, sure, but the entire political party could also be blamed, along with the establishment itself. Was Kamala the best candidate to run? Probably not. Biden decided to try for another term, though, and we ended up where we are.

    When you can choose between the lesser of 2 evils, or not choose at all: be aware of what “not choosing” will actually do.