I’ve just banned everyone from SJW. /s

Sorry, that honestly really sucks of them.
Allowing oneself to be vulnerable is one of the greater signs of trust I can think of.
Whenever someone in my life opens up or shows vulnerability, I’m mostly honored that they trusted me enough.
Especially someone you’ve known a while.

I hope you find someone in life where you can be open without strict roles and expectations.

Best old school perk is doing all your stupid kid shit at a time where cameras weren’t ubiquitous.

“No it’s fine I’ve been tested”

You could zap just the number if you wanted.

This way you still have the bell icon to go to https://sh.itjust.works/inbox, but no number next to it.
When visiting the inbox, DMs, replies and mentions have their own filter that your can use to browse more easily.

Yup, previous mods seem deleted.
Transferring might make the most sense if OP is up for it.
Probably something for @mp3@lemmy.ca

Yea I don’t think you can turn these off.

There is a “mark all as read” button in there which can get rid of those, but it applies to everything, including DMs and whatnot.
I guess you could also just zap that element with ublock origin or something and you’d stop seeing those altogether.

This way you can technically still go there if you need to look but zap just the number.

Do you mean just the bell icon at the top of the website page?
Or like an actual desktop notification pop-up?

800% APR is such absolute bullshit.
Like, even the mob would front you some cash with a lower rate.

Home bans federate everywhere.
Remote bans don’t, which makes sense, because otherwise lemmygrad could ban your sjw account which makes no sense.
That’s kinda how they go to the workaround of banning from every community in that instance.
But then .world is still running an old version that doesn’t do that anyway

I think the only way I’d ever give it another shot is if there was a mod that deleted most dialogue and story and just skipped from minigame to minigame without context.
Maybe.

I vaguely remember genociding squirrels with a flame thrower…

Unpopular opinion: It Takes Two was overrated.
The gameplay had its moments, but the storyline and characters were just terrible.

I love a good couch co-op, but playing it felt like being forced into role-playing a shitty stereotype of some bickering narcissist parents.
My wife and I couldn’t finish it.

Hey honey, did you wanna play the lazy ass disengaged deadweight tonight? or would you rather play as the workaholic narcissist?
I think we were just about to try and destroy some toy our daughter loves, so she’d cry for our benefit.
I think that’s what the annoying talking sociopath book suggested and that’s like a metaphor for crushing her feelings, or something.

Nah, I’m fine thanks.

yea, me too

Well I got cut off by word limit.

You can put text in a post’s body, and not only in its title.

Thanks for saving me a click.
Fuck tencent

This thing has kinda become the Half-Life 3 of books, too popular for its own good.
The expectations of it probably getting in the way of it being released.

I really can’t umagine however any aviation companies ever designed and built airplanes that didn’t fall out of the sky before they fitted all employees with chair occupancy butt plugs.

Yea I’m not saying it’s a great way to do this, but that’s the lemmy way right now.
I think it is meant as a workaround, maybe someone implements something better eventually.

When you telegraph your planned rug pull too much in advance.

The community bans also include communities that aren’t moderated by any instance admins, and some that are only moderated by a single person who likely isn’t aware of actions taken under their community’s name.

FYI, any site bans will also automatically generate community bans for all local communities that user has ever interacted with.
It’s simply the current behavior for site bans and not an admin going through communities to ban that user.
That doesn’t mean the site ban is legitimate, just that the community-bans are inherent to any site-bans.

It’s to highlight something fucked up that’s sometimes done on women after giving birth.

Quoting another comment in the thread:

the Husband Stitch is a real thing that used to be pretty commonly done regardless of what the woman wanted and often without her foreknowledge or consent. It’s an extra stitch or two placed when sewing a woman back up after a vaginal tear or episiotomy during labor. The purpose is to make the woman “tighter” so her husband can still enjoy having sex with her even though she’s given birth, which is staggeringly misogynistic and cruel. And it usually results in really painful sex for the woman because her vaginal opening is artificially small plus now it has inflexible scar tissue.