Meta is so unwilling to pay for news under a new Canadian law that it’s starting to block it on Facebook and Instagram in that country::The rollout of the news ban on Facebook and Instagram for users in Canada will take place over the next few weeks.

  • Lemmylaugh@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Canadian residents can access news online by going directly to news websites, using mobile news applications, and subscribing to preferred publishers.

    Lol. Or you know. Lemmy!!

  • SinTacks@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    I would check Facebook more often than now (never) if it was just updates and pics from my friends and family. Right now Facebook is just shitty Reddit. Ban news for everyone Zuck!

    • PyroNeurosis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Individuals who only get news from social media may find less “respectable” news coverage and an increase in “news” from sources who rely on unsavory backers.

      Which is to say: if Facebook won’t pay for legitimate news coverage, misinformation will drown everything else out.

      • Concetta@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        I disagree. Those people were already being massively misinformed, and didn’t click articles in the first place. All this means is next time a dipshit at work wants to argue with me I get to say “if it’s on facebook it’s entertainment not news”.

  • AphoticDev@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wait, this article makes it sound like Meta would have to pay for other people posting links on Facebook to news websites. If that’s the case, that’s nuts. Are they gonna try doing this with Reddit and Lemmy too, or does it just apply to Facebook? Cause that’s a great way to get Canadian news sites banned from everything on the entire net.

  • Nastybutler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    No one here is realizing the ridiculousness of telling an internet company that DRIVES TRAFFIC to journalism they must pay for the privilege of sending them the traffic. I’m not a fan of FB, but extorting a company for sending you business is like a reverse protection racket. Whether it’s FB or Google, or Duck Duck Go, it’s asinine.

    • angryzor@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      As I understood it from a previous incarnation of this topic where it involved Google it’s less nonsensical than it sounds (at least it was in that specific case, this one may be different, so take this post with a grain of salt).

      The thing these media companies have issue with is that their content is displayed on the social media website’s feed, usually in the form of a headline and a short summary. Many people will only read the headline and this summary and will never actually visit the website of the media company, so they can’t monetize these users through the ads on their website or through subscription services. Meanwhile Google/Facebook get to extract value from their content for free.

      Of course by that logic you could maybe also say that users should get paid for posting links as they have added their own value by curating the content displayed on the social media site, but they don’t have a team of lobbyists. :)

  • Gorilladrums@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m with the Zucc on this one. Facebook is a platform, they are not in charge of the content that gets published on there. Anybody can post anything at anytime. If people want to share news articles on there, they do so on their own. Why would Facebook pay media companies money for the actions of their users? It hurts their business? Fuck them and their business, it’s a new economy. You either adapt or die. If these multibillion dollar corporations haven’t been able to milk social media then that’s their problem. They’re not entitled to Facebook’s revenue regardless of how much you or I hate it.

    This just sounds like the dying traditional media industry is trying to leech off of the success of others in order to cling on to dear life. Fuck em.

  • diffuselight@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Imagine being forced to make a better product.

    That said, after the Threads position the actual story here is that Meta no longer thinks that the benefit of news outweighs the hassle. If it didn’t, they’d pay.

    And they are likely right - AI + US election cycle news isn’t gonna be a net positive for them

  • FoxBJK@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    This will probably have no affect on Facebook’s profits but will definitely result in a big drop in traffic to the news sites, ultimately costing them money.

    Same thing happened in Spain. Not sure why Canada thought it’d go differently for them.

  • Thorgs@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Good for Canada. Being more aktiv and critical in reading and searching for news is good and way better than getting “presented” with the news Meta selectively wants you to see.

  • ikidd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    And everyone I know will still continue to use fucking Facebook. Zuckerbot could rape their children in front of them and they’d be posting pics of it as it happens.

  • Terevos@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    20
    ·
    1 year ago

    The law is dumb, so I hope they don’t pay and these news orgs die because no one will know about them in a few years.

    • Yerbouti@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      So it’s you that gets his news from Facebook . I was wondering who it was.

      • Terevos@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Nah. I’m not on Facebook anymore. But this law could easily affect places like reddit and lemmy and mastodon, twitter, and the rest of the internet. It sets a bad precedent.

      • Terevos@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I have no love for tech bosses.

        Let me ask you - do you think we shouldn’t be allowed to share links to news articles on Lemmy?

        • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think if a business is monetizing news, they should pay the news org.

          Why do you think FB should have a free right to others’ work?

          • Terevos@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I see. So the end of the free and open internet. And all hail the pay to view internet. Want information? News? Weather? To interact with anyone else? Gotta pay up for every interaction.

            Tim Berners Lee would be rolling in his grave (if he were dead)