• MotoAsh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s just a possible implication for insisting on using Nazi iconography. Doesn’t have to be true, it’s just a natural implication with insistance. After all, a kid wouldn’t insist on McD’s unless they actually liked it. Yes, not necessarily applicable to art, but we’re talking implications, not statements of fact!

    • PaupersSerenade@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      My apologies, I truly didn’t mean anything along those lines. It is an important feature of the musical, but that’s hard to describe in a four panel Yu-Gi-Oh meme. If that’s the consensus though, I’m happy to remove.

      • Baby Shoggoth [she/her]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        to me the flow of “anti-nazi org says no -> i found a loophole -> anti nazi org is shocked and defeated” feels uncomfortable to me. it’s not the subject matter or your point, but presented in this yugioh format it feels like it’s leaning on the wrong side to me.

        • Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          To me it felt more like

          Modern anti Nazi place says “No, we don’t want to be associated with that.”

          Director says “You have a history of it, we’ll show you guys welcoming them instead.”

          Modern anti Nazi place says “Fine just don’t show that footage of us happily welcoming them”