Four German military officials discussed what targets German-made Taurus missiles could potentially hit if Chancellor Olaf Scholz ever allowed them to be sent to Kyiv, and the call had been intercepted by Russian intelligence.

According to German authorities, the “data leak” was down to just one participant dialling in on an insecure line, either via his mobile or the hotel wi-fi.

The exact mode of dial-in is “still being clarified”, Germany has said.

“I think that’s a good lesson for everybody: never use hotel internet if you want to do a secure call,” Germany’s ambassador to the UK, Miguel Berger, told the BBC this week. Some may feel the advice came a little too late.

Eyebrows were raised when it emerged the call happened on the widely-used WebEx platform - but Berlin has insisted the officials used an especially secure, certified version.

Professor Alan Woodward from the Surrey Centre for Cyber Security says that WebEx does provide end-to-end encryption “if you use the app itself”.

But using a landline or open hotel wi-fi could mean security was no longer guaranteed - and Russian spies, it’s now supposed, were ready to pounce.

  • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    6 months ago

    Yeah blame it on hotel internet, not their shitty communication service that’s not encrypted.

    • General_Shenanigans@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      It probably is, but they didn’t disable the feature that allows you to dial in on a phone line for audio. That’s my guess.

  • JoYo@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    “I think that’s a good lesson for everybody: never use hotel internet if you want to do a secure call,” Germany’s ambassador to the UK, Miguel Berger, told the BBC this week.

    The exact mode of dial-in is “still being clarified”, Germany has said.

    OK, well the exact mode kinda fucking matters before you just scapegoat a hotel.

    This smells like a coverup.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Oh no. They’re not referring to a specific hotel. Seriously never use hotel Internet on a sensitive device or for sensitive business. You will regret it.

  • notannpc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    6 months ago

    In a world where I can deploy end to end encrypted comms servers to an old computer in my house, the fucking military of any country should, at a minimum, require encryption to join meetings where military strategy is being discussed.

  • adr1an@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    They can discuss missile targets but they don’t know how to set a secure comm channel, it makes me wonder… how old were they? why don’t they give a device with pre-installed VPN (incl. Killswitch) to all certain-rank officials and get done with this?..

    • BenPranklin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      They do. Its much more than a built in vpn, they also have specialized, hardened versions of communications apps on them. The weakest link in cybersecurity is usually the end user.

    • erwan@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      I think one issue is for high officials that outrank everyone, they can get away with getting an insecure device because they prefer an iPhone over the custom hardened phone on Android 10 locked down for secure reasons.

  • LifeBandit666@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    This happened because of an unintended backdoor into an end to end encrypted conversation.

    The British Government are actively trying to get back doors put into end to end encryption by law.

    They are doing this so they can spy on their own citizens to ostensibly make Britain safer.

    But as you can see, it actually would make it less safe.

  • sepiroth154@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    This doesnt add up… If the software was properly encrypted they shouldn’t have been able to carry out a man in the middle attack right?

    • vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      7 months ago

      Maybe he dialed in by telephone? It would be a complete boomer move, but I’ve seen people do it.

      • fluxion@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        7 months ago

        A researcher in cryptography in Berlin, Henning Seidler, believes the most likely theory is that the officer dialled in via his mobile phone and the call was picked up by spies’ antenna who can also “forward” the traffic onto the main, official antenna.

        Seems like the more likely theory

          • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            6 months ago

            “Intelligence” services cost taxpayers billions a year, so the billion dollar question is why is it possible to dial in to “official” military communications over insecure channels at all?

            Why doesn’t the government run their own signal or matrix infra? Why are they paying Cisco, and introducing the numerous attack vectors of a proprietary optionally-encrypted service?

            The threat of surveillance capitalism isn’t just in the dragnet surveillance of the population. It’s in the profiteering of “partnerships” between private and public — the drive of corrupt and incompetent political and military leadership to direct funds to sub-optimal proprietary services and protocols, instead of leveraging public funding to contribute to open-source and make hardened systems ubiquitous.

              • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                6 months ago

                That’s what I’m getting at. This ultimately isn’t the fault of some technobozo who dialled in from hotel wifi. If the system were fit for purpose, technobozo could dial in over any network.

                The is the fault of German politicians, military, and “intelligence”. This type of compromise should not exist as a matter of circumstance. It should only be possible when an end users device is directly compromised.

          • SkippingRelax@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            We are talking about the person/department that has ensured that they run an especially secure, certified, version of webex losing their job right?

            As much as I’d like to think that senior military people have some basic awareness about security, this is really a tool that was considered secure by the organisation. Sounds like a big gaping whole letting dialin enabled for anyone to use.

              • SkippingRelax@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                6 months ago

                Vut it shouldnt even happen. They were in Singapore at the time that, they had to join in remotely. There is a whole department responsible for running the infrastructure and make sure its secure, this is, hardly the end users fault.

                • Maggoty@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  Shit they probably could have just asked the US to use the local SCIF. It’s not like we don’t already know the information.

      • the_wise_wolf@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        6 months ago

        Yes, it is a boomer move. But don’t let Cisco off the hook. What kind of specially certified security feature is that, if it can be turned off so easily by accident.

      • zaphod@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        He most likely did, at least from what I can deduce from the published recording.

    • the_wise_wolf@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Sounds like the encryption is automatically turned off if someone calls in via phone. So technically e2e encryption is supported, but it’s a shit design just waiting for someone to accidentally misuse it.

      • SkippingRelax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        It sounds like this especially secure, certified, version of webex should probably not allow dial in via phone should it?

    • Jagermo@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      It they used the client, yes. But in you dial in via sip, that opens up so many ways to screw up. Old software, open wifi, legacy hardware, you name it.

    • Nightwatch Admin@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      Yes, it’s not the 90s anymore. The network is hostile. If it’s not, nice but you’d be a fool to trust even your own. Encryption all the way!

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    6 months ago

    I don’t see how it matters if you use hotel WiFi or mobile if the mobile mast you connect to is controlled by a hostile government.

    What matters is what you were sending wasn’t secured at source.

    Although Wikipedia tells you the range and I’m pretty sure even Russia have access to maps and a compass.

    • Natanael@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      You don’t even need a VPN if the software uses proper TLS encryption or equivalent

    • FuzzChef@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      These VPN ad campaigns are incredibly detrimental to people’s understanding of security mechanisms in the internet.

      • RealJoL@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        How would this not have helped out in this case? I imagine the Bundeswehr must have an organization-wide VPN which would render any MITM in a local Wifi network impossible, barring user error.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          The data still has to go through the man in the middle. It doesn’t matter if it’s encrypted by the VPN or the App.

  • gapbetweenus@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    Isn’t like very basic security advice to not use random connections for sensitive information? But than again it’s Germany, pretty sure he has his password written down on a sticky note.

  • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    EvE Online should be mandatory training for anyone with a security clearance. Minimum of six months in Goonswarm, Pandemic Horde, Fraternity, or The Initiative.

    https://cad-comic.com/comic/one-of-us/

    That’s only a slight exaggeration. I had a “chat” with one of our intel officers at one point due to a IRL purchase of PLEX.

    Edit: maybe just Goonswarm. They do the intelligence and spy stuff the best.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    He sounds relaxed on the line as he chats with two colleagues about the “mega” view from his room, and how he’s just come back from a drink at a nearby hotel where there’s an incredible swimming pool.

    Over the next 40 minutes, the group appear to touch upon highly sensitive military issues, including the ongoing debate over whether Germany should send Taurus cruise missiles to Ukraine.

    The four participants discussed what targets German-made Taurus missiles could potentially hit if Chancellor Olaf Scholz ever allowed them to be sent to Kyiv - a contentious issue in Germany.

    “You have to choose a certain kind of disguise for this disaster,” says Mr Kiesewetter, who’s also worked at the Nato military alliance and is a member of Germany’s opposition conservative CDU party.

    But German government figures find suggestions that they are somehow soft on Russia increasingly irritating, particularly because Berlin has donated more weapons aid to Ukraine than any other nation in Europe.

    It’s further exposed domestic divisions about whether to send Taurus missiles to Ukraine and prompted a wider discussion about the country’s perceived defence and security weaknesses.


    The original article contains 1,075 words, the summary contains 187 words. Saved 83%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!