• bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    238
    arrow-down
    33
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Outdoor cat: “today I killed 300 birds and permanently altered the local ecosystem”

    Indoor cat: “hehe I shit in a box”

    • CashewNut 🏴󠁢󠁥󠁧󠁿@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      68
      arrow-down
      31
      ·
      5 months ago

      And so begins a new battle in the eternal war between Americans with indoor cats and others with outdoor cats.

      It’s pretty difficult to actually find an indoor cat in the UK. In the US it’s common.

      • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        I guess we in Finland are Americand now lol

        We’re more worried about the cats wellbeing though than the birds.

      • EdibleFriend@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        5 months ago

        Which is fitting because, in the end, when the hell have the British cared about the fallout of anything they do

          • EdibleFriend@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            5 months ago

            Lol American is the fallout of you people sending all your crazy religious fucks across the ocean and hoping for the best

            • Ann Archy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 months ago

              Heeeyy! We just kicked them out, we didn’t know they’d go and start a new country overseas!

              We honestly should have killed them there and then, nip it in the bud.

            • ThenThreeMore@startrek.website
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              To be fair I wouldn’t say we ‘sent them’ more that they left because they couldn’t oppress people as much as they wanted.

          • EdibleFriend@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            5 months ago

            It was a light hearted joke about the British that clearly hit a little close to home considering your rage.

            • thoughtorgan@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              5 months ago

              You’re literally crying about animals killing other animals. Stupid, non-verbal animals that function on instinct.

              • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                … Which is why you need to keep them inside, because when they are outside they act on instinct.

                12 year olds understand this. Where are you stuck? Is it because I didnt use large colorful pictures? Are words with 5+ letters the problem?

      • lad@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        I’m not so sure both about Americans having their cats indoors, and “others” having it the opposite way. I have never been to the UK or the US, but most owners I had seen kept their cats indoors. Except for Georgia (the country), where cats seem to be treated as some sort of weed that grows on it’s own

        • Pandantic@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          Except for Georgia (the country), where cats seem to be treated as some sort of weed that grows on it’s own

          I like this phrasing. I’d love to hear more about how you came to this conclusion.

          • lad@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            5 months ago

            There are a lot of strays around at first sight, but then I found out that at least about a third of them have owner/owners because they sometimes stick to several places. A lot of people also care for the strays and check them for issues not taking 'em home, some initiatives are doing neutering and finding homes for treated cats.

            I heard it’s somewhat similar in Türkiye, everyone loves cats but mostly don’t want to care about them above feeding them when met. Don’t know if outdoor cats are popular there, though

        • CashewNut 🏴󠁢󠁥󠁧󠁿@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          31
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          5 months ago

          Nope. And the RSPB doesn’t believe cats are a concern:

          The UK’s largest bird charity, the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB), is not particularly concerned about the impact of cats on the British mainland.

          https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/aug/14/cats-kill-birds-wildlife-keep-indoors

          And a Bristol study found cats kill the “doomed” weak and sick birds - not healthy birds: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1474-919X.2008.00836.x

          • Repelle@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            29
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            Cats have also been around in the UK significantly longer than many other places. Here in Hawaii they’re a plague on native species that had no such predators before.

            • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              17
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              5 months ago

              That’s a big part of the difference. Cats in the old world are probably fine since everything there has evolved alongside them. But the native species in the Americas haven’t had housecats to worry about until relatively recently in evolutionary terms.

              • jpeps@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                5 months ago

                I’m a outdoor cat person but in fairness one issue to consider is that while cats are natural in Europe, their current numbers and general location are something that’s pretty unnatural. I definitely err on the side of not being concerned about it, but I do think it’s something to consider as people have more pets.

                Personally I have one cat that has brought in a single frog, and another that exclusively brings in recycling.

            • deweydecibel@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              5 months ago

              Yeah but Hawaii’s ecosystem is different from the mainland, too. Every area is going to handle this differently.

          • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            15
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            The UK used to have a different feline species that was native to the isles.

            Its likely going extinct because of the UK obsession with outdoor cats.

            • shottymcb@lemm.ee
              cake
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              Since 2017, the Cat Classification Task Force of the Cat Specialist Group recognizes Felis silvestris silvestris as the valid scientific name for all European wildcat populations, arguing that it is doubtful that the Scottish wildcat is sufficiently distinct to accord it separate subspecific status.

              It’s just a plain old cat, it’s not going extinct.

          • thehatfox@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            Yes, according to the RSPB habitat destruction from expanding urban areas and farmland is the main threat to bird life in the UK.

            When my family had a cat it would mostly catch and bring home earthworms.

      • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        5 months ago

        And thats why the wild felines are going extinct in the british isles.

        Ay, but tradition right? Fuck the natives, as is british tradition

        • veroxii@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          Yeah the British really do have a history of royally fucking over whole eco systems. Brought rabbits to Australia thinking they would be a good food source.

          Except they bred like well rabbits. And destroyed whole eco systems. So the British imported foxes to eat the rabbits. Except literally every other native species is easier for a fox to kill than a fast rabbit.

          Fucking morons.

          • Badger@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            That’s a bit of a harsh take considering it was one guy on the 19th century who didn’t know better. Looking at it he brought 13 rabbits for his private estate - I don’t think the science was there for extended Environmental Impact Studies back then - just some rich guy making a minor change to his place having unintended consequences so branding an entire country as fucking morons is a bit much.

      • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 months ago

        Where I live you’re not supposed to let the cats roam free because it’s dangerous to them and they can get ran over, get diseases, hurt themselves without you being able to do anything etc.

        I guess the local ecosystem is a plus but it’s mostly for the cat’s benefit afaik.

      • TrousersMcPants@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Indoor cats are generally healthier, if you give them enough enrichment. I live in a tiny little house but my cat has boxes to hide in, toys to play with, multiple spots to look out windows, etc. She won’t get sick or injured as much as an indoor/outdoor cat and will probably live longer.

    • deweydecibel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      More like “today someone left food out for me as usual so I didn’t hunt like I would if I were starving”.

      70% of bird deaths are from fetal and stray cats, not just “outdoor” cats.

    • TwoCubed@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      25
      ·
      5 months ago

      Our 3 cats kill maybe a total of 5 birds and 10 mice a year. They can’t reproduce and prefer to stay inside for most of the year. They’re not a problem, as many new studies have found out. At least in northern Germany. It might be a bigger problem elsewhere though. Just trying to point out that your criticism may only apply to certain areas.

      • Spuddlesv2@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        That’s what you know they have killed. Who knows how much more. They also still get hit by cars, mauled by dogs, attacked by other cats, piss and shit in other people’s yards.

      • RubberElectrons@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        That you know of. I’m a bird lover, I’ve got my biases, admittedly. But no, cats seem to put a very heavy strain on the local bird population.

    • Lizardking27@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      94
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Not how cats work. Nice job getting butthurt about a funny comic on the internet, though.

      And just so you can be better informed in the future. Feral cats are the ones affecting the ecosystem. Outdoor house cats have a negligible influence on wildlife. Let your cat go outside sometimes.

      And, just a guess, you should probably go outside sometimes too.

      "The magnitude of mortality they cause in mainland areas remains speculative, with large-scale estimates based on non-systematic analyses and little consideration of scientific data. Here we conduct a systematic review and quantitatively estimate mortality caused by cats in the United States. We estimate that free-ranging domestic cats kill 1.3–4.0 billion birds and 6.3–22.3 billion mammals annually. Un-owned cats, as opposed to owned pets, cause the majority of this mortality."

      Downvoting doesn’t make you right and it doesn’t make your cats less miserable.

      • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        56
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        5 months ago

        Thats exactly how cats work.

        The comic is funny and cute, but dont get it twisted. The science is pretty firm on the destructive effects of invasive domestic cats.

        • Lizardking27@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          42
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          "The magnitude of mortality they cause in mainland areas remains speculative, with large-scale estimates based on non-systematic analyses and little consideration of scientific data. Here we conduct a systematic review and quantitatively estimate mortality caused by cats in the United States. We estimate that free-ranging domestic cats kill 1.3–4.0 billion birds and 6.3–22.3 billion mammals annually. Un-owned cats, as opposed to owned pets, cause the majority of this mortality."

          Maybe don’t believe every sensationalized social media article that’s really just a barely disguised cat litter ad.

          “The science is pretty firm” lmao

          • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            44
            arrow-down
            12
            ·
            5 months ago

            Im a professional ecologist. I have to listen to one of my colleagues rant about this topic on a nearly weekly basis, because its the focus of her grant work.

            There are multiple groups of actual researchers in nearly every institute of biological study on the planet dedicated to spreading local awareness about wild cats.

            There are multiple websites entirely dedicated to trying to inform people that the small apex predator from a far off desert doesnt actually belong wandering the wilds of your neighborhood.

            There are a few actual native species of wild felines currently threatened due to feral domestic cats, that are having trouble becoming stable again because of folk like you.

            The kind of person who doesnt really grok that owned cats are where feral cats come from, because your cat is fucking left and right in the bushes.

            The kind of person who thinks their cat can win a fight with a car, or coyote, or wolf, or fox, or badger, or weasel, or any other predator in the wild that youre gleefully feeding it to.

            The kind of person who is to blame for multiple feline diseases spreading and festering in local populations because you let your cat go pick them up from the source and spread them about willy nilly.

            The kind of person who failed to pay attention in grade school science.

            But please. Go on, tell me how the majority of science is a pop article about cat litter, flunkie.

              • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                26
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                I mean… I know Im not lying, and my comments are repeating the current standard. So either you retired 4 decades ago, or youre about as successful an ecologist as you are a conversationalist.

                Letting your cat outdoors means its interacting with wild populations. That makes it succeptable to the same problems. An ecologist would know this.

                A responsible pet owner doesnt let their pets roam outdoors, so thats a confirmed lie. But at least its not breeding, yes.

                Wildcats are often refered to as apex predators in their native environments, because they dont live near all those predators. But piddling over the exact definition of apex doesnt really stop your cat becoming a coyote meal.

                This basic concept is a grade school science lesson. If you dont know algebra, why would I assume you took calculus classes?

                Some of us, sure. I dont think youre part of that collective group though.

                For starters, Ive never met an ecologist who wants to feed their pets to the local wildlife, or who completely ignores the massive issue of feline disease spreading.

                E: I just noticed your edit, on apex predation. Do you genuinely think that cats cannot be an ecological threat to small mammal, reptile, and amphibian populations just because they can be eaten by larger locals? By that logic, you are counting on your pet getting eaten. Thats… Thats insanely fucked up.

                • Pandantic@midwest.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  5 months ago

                  By that logic, you are counting on your pet getting eaten. Thats… Thats insanely fucked up.

                  And something an actual ecologist would have thought of, as you are essentially considering your pet cat as part of the food web, a high school level ecological concept.

                • Lizardking27@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  30
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  “Never met an ecologist who wants to feed their pets to the local wildlife.”

                  “A responsible pet owner doesnt let their pets roam outdoors.”

                  Dude. You’re clearly not an ecologist, just some loudmouth repeating sensationalist, unfounded, unresearched pseudoscience. Just stop.

              • GBU_28@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                13
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                5 months ago

                You can put anything you like in quotes, it’s not cited. As a “professional ecologist” you’d habitually cite your sources

              • Alteon@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                10
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                5 months ago

                If you don’t think outdoor cats, not just feral cats, are destroying the ecosystem, then you’re not only an ignorant ecologist, but a fucking dangerous one. God only knows what other goody-ass looney tunes theories you have. Not only are you misinformed, but you go so far as to defend and spread that misinformation. Jfc.

              • Pandantic@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                Well some us have actual educations, with degrees and everything.

                The argument is based on hearsay, personal experience, and this flimsy excuse for authority.

                Troll, or insane person?

              • trolske@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                5 months ago

                As a “professional ecologist” you should be aware of the concept of “landscape of fear”.
                Non-consumptive effects have an equally strong (some argue an even stronger) effect on prey populations compared to consumptive effects.
                Letting domesticated cats roam freely creates an unnaturally high predation pressure in the area and has more effects on the local wildlife than just killing it.

      • hips_and_nips@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        Nice job getting butthurt

        Your other comment drivel makes the irony here quite palpable. It’s delicious.

        • Lizardking27@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          33
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          "The magnitude of mortality they cause in mainland areas remains speculative, with large-scale estimates based on non-systematic analyses and little consideration of scientific data. Here we conduct a systematic review and quantitatively estimate mortality caused by cats in the United States. We estimate that free-ranging domestic cats kill 1.3–4.0 billion birds and 6.3–22.3 billion mammals annually. Un-owned cats, as opposed to owned pets, cause the majority of this mortality."

          • ALQ@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            27
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            You keep posting this without citing a source, which doesn’t help your argument. Please provide a source for this quote.

              • ALQ@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                25
                ·
                5 months ago

                If you want anyone to take your argument seriously, then you do the opposite of thinking for others - you provide your sources so your audience can review and then think for themselves based on the data. Otherwise you’re just expecting people to take your word for it, which means you would be doing all of the thinking for the people who don’t question which, based on your comment, is not what you want.

                Thank you for providing the source.

              • Signtist@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                21
                ·
                5 months ago

                This study is about the immense magnitude of cat predation, and your takeaway is that we shouldn’t limit owned cat predation simply because un-owned cat predation is higher…

                We estimate that cats in the contiguous United States annually kill between 1.3 and 4.0 billion birds (median=2.4 billion) (Fig. 1a), with ∼69% of this mortality caused by un-owned cats. The predation estimate for un-owned cats was higher primarily due to predation rates by this group averaging three times greater than rates for owned cats.

                This study estimates that annual bird deaths by owned cat predation in the US is around a 750 million median figure, and you’re just fine with that?

              • GBU_28@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                10
                ·
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                If you quote an authority source you are obligated to cite it. It is not other’s job to backwards full-text-search a quote to determine who your were referencing. Pretty common academia stuff, but as you said you’re an ecologist and for sure know that, so you must have omitted it purposefully

          • Jimmycrackcrack@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            It kind of sounds like this is part of a paper that is detailing seemingly large amounts of predation from cats of which the majority is attributable to un-owned cats which I gather you reckon means “outdoor” owned cats aren’t a big threat to wildlife populations since they aren’t responsible for the greatest amount of the total predation from cats overall.

            But, without the context, the numbers cited sound instinctively like ‘big’ numbers so if the total magnitude of predation from cats is large and “owned” cats are responsible only for a fraction of it, their contribution could well be substantial nonetheless. Not knowing the scope or the details of the quoted paper it’s unclear if it goes in to what the estimated proportion is other than not the majority and its unclear how much predation can be tolerated by the populations upon which cats, both owned and unowned, prey.

            For example maybe owned cats are responsible for 40% of the total predation by cats on local wildlife in an area with the remaining 60% being attributable to un-owned cats. This would make un-owned cats majority responsible for the predation yet you could reduce the total predation by 40% if owned cats were all kept indoors in that hypothetical. The actual numbers are likely different and could well be much more slanted between owned vs un-owned cats’ share of predation but if the estimates for the sustainable amount of predation certain populations can withstand are below the current total amount of predation then removing even a smaller fraction might be the difference between endangerment and extinction.

            • Devi@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              5 months ago

              Exactly this, as Signtist posted above, about 31% of deaths are predicted to be from owned cats which is around 750 million birds per year. That’s horrific.

              Cats, even owned ones, have cause extinctions

    • doctorcrimson@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      5 months ago

      Absolute environmental disaster, they need to be spayed and neutered and occasionally culled by any competent local government.

      • UndercoverUlrikHD@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        5 months ago

        You’ll also need to ban pet cats from walking outside without a leash. Our cats were neutered, didn’t stop them from killing any mice or birds they could get their paws on.

        • doctorcrimson@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          21
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          5 months ago

          The reason they need to be spayed and neutered instead of outright killed is because culls don’t really work on animals that reproduce that quickly. Whenever a spot opens up for another cat to make its territory, it gets immediately claimed. There are a ton of research papers that show spaying and neutering is more effective at lowering stray populations, and that euthanization is more costly on top of being less effective.

          • UndercoverUlrikHD@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            16
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            I was talking about the cats that are kept as pets, not stray cats. I guess it varies from country to country, but most cats walking around outside in Norway are pets (~90%). Reducing the stray cat population to zero wouldn’t fix the issue of cats killing all the small wildlife unless pet cats are also kept inside.

            I wasn’t saying anything against neutering cats.

            • doctorcrimson@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              19
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              If the cat never exits the home then idgaf honestly, but if it escapes then it should be eliminated in the most effective way possible. That is my stance, an unattended cat is a stray for all intents and purposes.

              • dragonflyteaparty@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                5 months ago

                Wow that’s cruel. Someone’s cat gets loose, they can’t find it yet, and you think it should be killed. Good job killing Fluffy because he escaped.

                • doctorcrimson@lemmy.today
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  But letting it slaughter little birds is not cruel, somehow? A manmade pest with no beneficial role to nature is somehow much better to you than functioning ecosystems? If a cat gets out, the owner has made a mistake and will now deal with the consequences.

          • Ann Archy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            5 months ago

            I’d say we take this one step further and declaw, spay, neuter, and keep a lot of people on a leash.

    • summerof69@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      32
      ·
      5 months ago

      I miss the internet where people could laugh at a silly comics instead of writing and upvoting this.

      • RubberElectrons@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        Mate, we’re old enough now to have to actually fix shit instead of waxing lyrical about our youth. Let’s work together, and still have a laugh.

      • Streetdog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        5 months ago

        They’re projecting. There is an industry killing billions of animals which is also very bad for the environment and ecosystems. If only they could be as passionate about that as about someone else’s cat…

        • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          5 months ago

          “Who cares that I club seals? Johnny next door clubs 50 walruses. Sure theyre both going extinct now, but he gets 50 a day! I only get 1!! How could you care that Im clubbing seals with all those dead walruses?”

          • Streetdog@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            5 months ago

            Exactly the poor logic you’d expect from someone who didn’t go to college. Apparently most of Lemmy…

            • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              5 months ago

              Im a professional ecologist, there, animal abuser.

              But go on, keep telling me how you failed middle school bio so hard that you know better than the global scientific community

      • Grayox@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        Do you get off on animals going extinct? What is wrong with you?

        “Outdoor domestic cats are a recognized threat to global biodiversity. Cats have contributed to the extinction of 63 species of birds, mammals, and reptiles in the wild”

        • thoughtorgan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          17
          ·
          5 months ago

          Pretty fuckin low on the priority list to be honest. Cats have been doing this forever. Humans are way worse.

          • Grayox@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            5 months ago

            Yeah in their natural habitats, humans are the ones that brought cats with them enabling them to hunt species to extinction. Cats could not have done it without humanity’s help.

          • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            Cats are part of the human problem. If you cant reason that bit out, you 100% should not be responsible for another living thing, and probably need regular supervision from an adult to keep you from hurting yourself

            • thoughtorgan@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              This planets already fucked.

              Compare the damage humans have done to this planet compared to cats, and tell me THAT’S the problem we should be focusing on.

              This planets fucked precisely because people like you worry about the smallest part of the problem possible while championing yourselves as intellectually and morally superior. You’re just stupid.

              • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                The cats are part of the damage done by humans.

                This subject is literally my job, dropout. Just because you dont grasp what we teach to children about nature doesnt make the facts suddenly warp to your feelings.

        • RubberElectrons@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          Why are you proud of lacking empathy for other living creatures? Are you hollow inside? When will you become part of figuring out a balance, instead of being proud of the problem?

          • thoughtorgan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            There’s not a problem. You guys are worried about pet cats killing birds.

            Long list of shit before that’s even remotely on my radar. Get a grip man and realize how privileged you are to sit here complaining about bullshit fuckin problems online.

            • RubberElectrons@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 months ago

              Do you realize how many other places in the universe have birds and cats and whales? They’re our only other companions in a cold, hard universe where so much can go wrong.

              As such, I care a lot more about flora and fauna than mere human achievements and the problems that have resulted; while I’m proud of my species we also need to protect life in our respective little corners. That starts by not letting cats outdoors, and that’s a fact.

  • deweydecibel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    78
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Realistically, outdoor cats don’t travel much. They just hang out in their neighborhood, chill in their favorite spots, etc.

    Cats have their territory and that’s where they spend their time, doing cat things. It’s just that an outdoor cat’s territory isn’t limited by walls.

    • thehatfox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      54
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      There was a BBC documentary a few years ago where they gave GPS tracking collars to a bunch of cats in a neighbourhood and tracked where they went. Each of the cats had their own territory and favourite locations.

      • vojel@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        5 months ago

        I think I watched this one and also a German documentary. It even showed that elderly cats roam way less then younger ones. Pretty interesting.

      • jpeps@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        5 months ago

        I loved that doc! It was fascinating seeing the vast differences in territory. I remember one cat who travelled something like a mile back and forth every day on a really narrow area. There was also a pair of cats that had worked out a little territory share amongst themselves, patrolling the same area but always 12 hours apart from each other.

    • Son_of_dad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      59
      arrow-down
      40
      ·
      5 months ago

      Murder local wildlife, cause property damage to neighbors, kill neighbors pets, spread disease. Roaming cats suck, and so do their entitled owners who think that everyone’s property belongs to their pet

      • Umbraveil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        5 months ago

        While we’re at it, let’s get rid of birds that shit on everything, deer that eat our gardens, raccoons that get in our trash, skunks that dig up our grass …

        • Pelicanen@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          They brought up how cats disturb the ecosystem and spread disease. You brought up how other animals can disturb people’s capital. These two are not equivalent.

          • XIIIesq@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            Cats are natural in many parts of the world.

            The Scottish wild cat for instance came to the UK across a land bridge 9000 years ago.

            This thread is full of people that have probably never left America, regurgitating virtue signalling nonsense that they know very little about.

            I understand that in some ecosystems that pet cats are devastating, but it’s just not true for most of the world.

            • trolske@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              5 months ago

              There’s an enormous difference in the natural occurrence of native wild cats and feral or roaming domestic cats.
              No one is arguing against native wild cats being around, but against artificially introducing a mesopredator into the ecosystem.

        • thoughtorgan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          5 months ago

          These people are fucking insane. Like they don’t go outside ever.

          Can you believe an ANIMAL killed another ANIMAL? 😱😱😱😱

          • Son_of_dad@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            5 months ago

            I have a pet parrot, a neighbors cat almost got through my window screen to attack my pet. That cat would not have survived, and then you can go “OMG A HUMAN KILLED A PEST” and we’ll see if you’re fair about it

            • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              You can leave that “S” out of “pest” and see how everyone would disagree with you.

      • BirdyBoogleBop@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        I guess some cats love to piss on doors but I don’t think much if any property damage is being done by pet cats. I don’t think I have ever heard of a cat kiling a pet either.

        Cats should be indoor only because they are murder hobos when it comes to wild birds and small animals.

        Spreading diesease I can’t comment on. What diesease do cats kept as pets spread?

        • Spuddlesv2@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Roaming pet cats scratch screen doors, destroy door mats, piss on doors, shit in gardens, kill wildlife for sport, fight other cats, catch diseases from other cats (pet and feral), get pregnant, get hit by cars, get mauled by dogs. All of these things happen even in countries where cats are “native”.

          • rektdeckard@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            5 months ago

            Find/replace cat/human. You are a clown to even deign to compare the negative environmental impact of a fucking cat to what we have done to everything we touch as a species

            • Carlo@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              12
              ·
              5 months ago

              Sure. And if people let their kids roam around killing birds and shitting in people’s gardens, they’re held responsible for it. The same should hold true for outdoor cat owners.

              • Son_of_dad@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                Exactly. Imagine if dog owners opened their doors at night and just let their pets fuck off to wherever? They would rightly be charged and have their pets taken away. But cat people for some reason do this exact thing and think it’s ok

        • Son_of_dad@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          My neighbors cats used to wreck my herb garden and such. One of them once tried to rip through my window screen to get inside my house and get my pet parrot. I would have made that cat disappear if he had gotten in, and his owner would have never known what happened, and that would be their own fault

          Can you imagine if dog owners just opened the door at night, and let their dogs fuck off to do whatever? They’d rightly be charged and have their pets taken away

          • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            You got plenty of dogs owners leaving their pets with small children.

            And those children getting mauled to death while the owner claims they would never do something since they are such a friendly family pet.

      • rektdeckard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        19
        ·
        5 months ago

        It’s entitled of YOU too think that the land, plants, wildlife, and ecology these creatures have lived off of for millennia belong to you. We all share a planet, it’s not up to humans to be the arbiters of who can have what and how much and at what time etc etc .

        Cats may not be sapient animals, but they are sentient.

        • RubberElectrons@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          No, sorry. We’ve unintentionally thrown so much of the world off balance by importing creatures that were never in certain places, that we must bear responsibility to bring things back to the balance they were at before we got there, particularly now that we know better.

          If that’s not possible, we’ll do our best to get there. Where are the dodos, buddy? Keep your stupid cats indoors, and stop bothering the local ecosystem more than we already have.

          • emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            we must bear responsibility to bring things back to the balance they were at before we got there

            The idea that nature was in some sort of balance before humans came along is a common misconception. Most ecosystems are dynamic, and change over time. What we are doing is accelerating that change to a dangerous level.

            This might seem like an academic distinction, but many conservationists have caused more harm than good by trying to ‘freeze’ ecosystems at a state that existed at some fixed point in the past. I believe it was George Monbiot who pointed out that the margins of many British roads had higher plant and insect diversity than many ‘protected’ areas.

            • RubberElectrons@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              Friend, cool it with the pedagogy. If one understands the idea of ecosystems at multiple scales, it follows implicitly that one understands the systems are inherently dynamic.

              The point still stands: we’ve got to understand the environs we’ve rapidly destabilized and do something to limit our negative influence. Ergo: keeping stupid cats indoors helps the stressed systems by reducing the load caused by a bored apex predator.

              • emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                Oops I forgot my point in saying all that, which was that if cats have become naturalised to your local ecosystem, then removing them could make things worse. (And by the way, cats are not apex predators.)

        • Son_of_dad@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          Blah blah blah, legally your cat is your PROPERTY. And if your pet becomes my pest on MY property, it will be dealt with as such. I don’t live in the wild, I live in my home on my property, keep your shit bag cat off of mine.

    • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      That is like saying all dogs should always be leashed and muzzled when outside.

      • UserFlairOptional@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Cats survived before us by hunting small mammals and small birds, and they are very effective at getting fed.

        The motivation at the core of naming owners of outdoor cats as irresponsible is a sharp decline in songbird populations in direct proportion to the increase in outdoor cat population.

    • rektdeckard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      39
      ·
      5 months ago

      You’re uninformed. Cats co-evolved with humans to serve a job (pest control, in exchange for safety and the occasional bit of food). There have only been fully indoor cats for a few hundred years. Not all cats have to have a job, but some WANT one, just like dogs. We should let them.

      My cat is angry with me if I don’t let him spend at least 12 hours a day roaming and catching bugs and mice. He has neighbor cat friends that he goes to see. Why would I deprive him of that?

      • doctorcrimson@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        I think we have different definitions of irresponsible or entitled behavior if you think giving the cat what it wants or otherwise doing whatever our selfish uninformed ancestors did is the correct option.

        You should deprive your invasive manmade predator the option to kill local wildlife for sport because the local ecosystem takes irreparable damage every time a species goes extinct due to human incompetence. Cats naturally belonged to a small region of northern Africa and the Mediterranean before humans spread them across the entire earth and let their population boom from hundreds to hundreds of millions.

          • doctorcrimson@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            5 months ago

            Yeah, actually, that’s accurate. Cats generally stick to a small territory, lots of studies show this behavior to be consistent. The spread of domestic cats has always been understood to coalesce with the spread of human agriculture.

          • doctorcrimson@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            17
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            5 months ago

            Ah yes, those damned educated people making choices that are beneficial to themselves and others. NEEEEEEERRRRRRRDDDSSSSS~!!!

            • fosho@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              5 months ago

              after finding it quite surprising that folks here feel so strongly about forcing such a depressing life on highly independent creatures, I decided to look for the evidence myself.

              sure enough, it’s not as clear as you all think. one of the problems with the research is that it is incorrectly applied to all environments without merit. and the biggest issue of all is that most of the problem is caused by feral cats.

              so no, your absolute position that all cats must be indoors only is not fully supported by evidence. furthermore it is alarming how quick people are to impose their beliefs on other creatures with only a small amount of reason.

              • doctorcrimson@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                If you don’t enforce indoor only cats with high precision then feral cats exist everywhere as a result.

                Literally no environment benefits from thousands of fucking cats.

                You will look for any excuse to avoid the guilt of our failures as a species.

                • fosho@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  owning pets isn’t about maximizing environmental benefits. your own existence is a much larger problem for that but no one is telling you to live your entire life in a boring box because we have too many humans. this hill is not important enough to warrant all you folks dying on it.

            • settoloki@lemmy.one
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              15
              ·
              5 months ago

              Tbf right or wrong the way you come across makes you sound like a dick. Though it’s probably the autism

              • doctorcrimson@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                5 months ago

                Nah I’m just a consequentialist, we all kind of have that “your feelings do not deter me” vibe.

      • Grayox@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        “Outdoor domestic cats are a recognized threat to global biodiversity. Cats have contributed to the extinction of 63 species of birds, mammals, and reptiles in the wild”

        You shouldn’t be proud of contributing to the extinction of animals…

      • Son_of_dad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        5 months ago

        Your cat is your property. Keep it in your property. If your pet becomes my pest, it will be dealt with as such. I once had a neighbor’s cat almost rip through my window screen to get inside and go after my pet parrot. If the cat had made it inside, he would not have made it out alive.

        Then I could return it’s corpse to you, and you can tell me all about how they evolved alongside humans, and how that means you’re entitled to let your pet fuck up my yard, home and pets

        • shottymcb@lemm.ee
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Fantasizing about killing pets is a strong indicator of psychopathy.

            • shottymcb@lemm.ee
              cake
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              If your pet bird is being attacked by a cat, by all means, do what you have to. Daydreaming about murdering cats because they’re scratching at your window is some sick shit, though.

      • threeduck@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        46
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        5 months ago

        Wherever there’s birds, it’s irresponsible to let cats out. NZ in particular, it’s a damn massacre out there.

        • Sunfoil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          5 months ago

          In the UK, the RSPB determines no negative impacts on bird populations. And the ecosystem is irrecoverably damaged from 3000 years of human impact on a relatively small island. Unlike new colonies like NZ, USA etc.

          • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            The UK is losing its wildcat population because of british arrogance about cats.

            Youre also bringing in all your local predators into human settlements with the free food that cats become. Foxes love outdoor cats, theyre easy meals. You know what else loves cats? Tires. Smears a cat like jam.

            But whats another destroyed ecosystem to the brits? Yall love ruining ecosystems, may as well fill your own backyard with piss.

            • Sunfoil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              5 months ago

              The wildcats are in Northern Scotland. I’d be OK with the Scots banning outdoor cats.

              Foxes like bins, they don’t fight back.

              I’ve seen maybe 1 domestic cat hit by a car, I’ve seen hundreds of hedgehogs, foxes, badgers and deer. That’s not an outdoor cat problem.

              It’s easy to sit on a moral high horse about a country you don’t really know anything about. We didn’t come to this land 300 years ago. The concept of an intact ecosystem vanished about 1000 years ago. It is a completely different island. The best we can do is keep the last of our wild species ticking over.

              Unlike the Americans, who exploited and continue to exploit one of the most beautiful lands in the world, when they should have known better.

              • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                The wildcats are now surviving in northern scotland. That was not their original range.

                Your lot thought a serial killer was on a cat mutilation spree, for 4 years, only to find out it was a fox that wasnt hiding its kills. So… No, sorry, you dont actually seem to know the country you live in very well. Foxes eat cats like candy, they just prefer to hide while they eat.

                But Im glad cat deaths only count when you see them, Im sure you cover your eyes often.

                “Unlike the americans.” Lol, ok bud. Because I know from actual formerly british researchers that you take care of your ecosystem as well as well as you take care of your relationship with the mainland.

                • Sunfoil@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  Okie doke. You’re clearly very angry about cats, so much so you managed to miss every point I made, good job.

        • MacDangus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          They’re saying that only people from the United States believe that outdoor cats are a net negative.

          • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            21
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            That’s not true. In Finland it’s actually against the law because it’s considered irresponsible animal ownership.

            USA isn’t the only place where there’s reason to fear the cat gets hurt, disease or could die.

          • Sunfoil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            That’s not what I’m saying. Not only the USA. Other places where domestic cats are very new, like USA, NZ, etc also probably shouldn’t do outdoor cats.

        • jpeps@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          5 months ago

          In countries where cats are native, they have significantly less impact on wildlife, or at the very least form a part of an ecosystem rather than being a manual introduction (admittedly one complication here is cat populations grouping up in suburban areas). As for safety for the cats, in their native countries they don’t have any serious predators to harm them.

          • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            I don’t know if Finland is considered native for cats but it’s against the law to let cats roam freely because there’s a very real risk of them getting injured, disease or dying. Not just from predators but from humans and cars and so on. A dead cat on the side of the road is a too common of a sight. I think the effect on wildlife is seen as secondary and the welfare of the cat is the foremost reason for it.

            • XIIIesq@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              I live in the UK where there are an estimated 10.8 million cats and have literally never seen “a dead cat on the side of the road”. I appreciate that it is a real risk and that it does happen, but you’re either blowing things out of proportion or there is something weird going on with Finnish cats and or Finnish drivers.

                • XIIIesq@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  5 months ago

                  230,000÷10,800,000÷4x100%≈0.5%

                  If I had to personally take that risk or stay in the house for the rest of my life. I’d choose freedom every time.

                  What’s really more selfish and entitled? Imprisoning an animal for life in return for an increased 0.5% of safety or letting it makes its own choice?

  • limelight79@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    I cannot imagine having an indoor/outdoor cat. I’d worry so much about them while they were away. And if they just disappeared and didn’t return…I don’t know how I could stand it.

    We have 3 indoor-only cats. Obviously I’m pretty attached to them.

    • jpeps@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      5 months ago

      I really understand that fear, and I do experience that with my outdoor cats. However cats tend to stick to their established territory and patterns and at least for mine, never go far and barely ever out of sight. In the summer being outdoor cats pretty much just means they sleep all day curled up in the garden.

      • limelight79@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yeah, I can’t do it. We have fox around, and plenty of community cats (one evening, I walked down the ravine looking for our dog after he ran off, and I shined my flashlight upward to see about 6 pairs of eyes staring at me). We had a cat get some sort of blood borne disease, we think she got it from a tick that was in the house when we moved in (it’s our only theory, we have no idea what actually happened), and she spent a few days in the animal hospital, and barely survived. (It also cost several thousand dollars.) Unfortunately she passed away from multiple medical issues a few years later. :(

        (We adopted another cat after she passed - we’ve never had more than 3 at once.)

        • jpeps@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          Sorry to hear about your cat! I’m assuming you’re in the states, and I’d agree that I don’t think I’d let a cat outside there. One extra bit of support in the UK is that it’s pretty unheard of to not routinely vaccinate your cats to protect against random diseases, but of course it can’t cover everything.

          • limelight79@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            I am. We always vaccinate our cats as well, and since that incident we give them regular flea and tick preventatives (well, two of them for the flea and tick - the third one is way too skittish to let us do that). In our case, there’s always a risk the dog brings something in, too, so it’s good to do.

          • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            Outdoor cats in the UK are driving your native wildcats extinct. Even if we ignore that the cat population is bringing foxes and badgers into human settlements because they make easy free meals.

            You arent immune to having invasive species. In fact the british are pretty directly responsible for a lot of invasive species problems globally, so I would think yall would grasp the concept by now.

            • jpeps@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              5 months ago

              Wildcat extinction is an extremely specific issue. Wildcats only exist in Scotland now, driven to near extinction mostly by humans, not mating with other cats. This happened literally hundreds of years ago and has practically nothing to do with house cats. Now interbreeding is an issue for the preservation of the small number of wildcats left in Scotland. It’s sad but hardly a concern for keeping cats in most areas of the UK.

              Secondly, I do ignore that cats are ‘bringing in foxes and badgers’. Can you present a source on this? I couldn’t find anything.

              • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                Sure, hand wave an extinction because its inconvenient.

                Do you actually need me to google uk cat death counts for you? Or do you think predators entering human settlements is normal?

                Did you guys not recently have a “serial cat murderer” who was just a fox leaving its kills in public places? Do you think thats a normal thing?

                • jpeps@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  How am I hand waving it? I’m stating an obvious truth. What impact on wildcats do you expect to come from cats in Cornwall, Ipswich, or Manchester?

                  I think you don’t have a clue what you’re talking about. Yes, I would like you to google cat death counts and show me any evidence for what you’re saying. I wouldn’t be surprised at all to find that cats sometimes get killed by other animals, but to suggest that it’s a significant cause of death or that they’re the reason that foxes are coming to ‘human settlements’ is complete nonsense. You make it sound like packs of badgers roam the streets of London at night.

                  Foxes in cities are very normal. They’re basically the UK’s raccoon. They scavenge things, including the bodies of cats hit by cars.

    • katy ✨@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      the most i’ve ever done is let my first cat go on the deck on a leash and even then i panicked the whole time. one time she got out of the slider at night and i couldn’t handle it thankfully she came back like an hour or so later

    • Umbraveil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      22
      ·
      5 months ago

      Sometimes, you gotta do what’s best for your cat. We have one that just couldn’t handle being indoors full-time. We put a Tractive GPS tracker on his collar. It gives peace of mind and if anything happens, at least we’ll know when to find him. He’s living his best cat life.

    • ikidd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      24
      ·
      5 months ago

      Never seen any cat that chose to stay inside even 50% of the time when given a choice. I’d rather they enjoy their life than make me feel better be cause they’re penned up all the time.

      • viking
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        My cats come and go as they please, one spends about 90% of her time indoors, the other mostly nights, but is gone during daytime. I usually see her when I walk my dog, she’ll creep up from behind a bush and finish the walk with us, come in for a snack and then be gone again.

      • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        5 months ago

        Far better to die young under a car tire, bleeding out slowly and painfully alone on the asphalt. Totally agree, way better than living your entire lifespan.

        • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          … in a gilded prison, never really have lived a single day in their entire lives.

          Yeah, I’d take my chances with the tire.

          • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            If your house is a gilded prison to your pets, youre a shit pet owner and you shouldnt own any animal of any kind.

            Like sorry bud, you can give a small mammal a fulfilling life inside your house pretty fuckin easy. Harness training a cat is so straight forward, too, so its not even a life permanently indoors.

            I get youre probably so fuckin lazy that you would prefer your pet gets its guts ripped out and dies slow in the worst pain of its life. But any normal adult capable of washing their ass can do better than you, so maybe you leave the big boy responsibilities to better people.

  • willis936@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    5 months ago

    A stranger outdoor cat just walked with me for a few blocks on my way home from a dinner party. It was fun to have a five minute feline friend. It’s sad to know they will very likely die long before my indoor cat of a similar age.

    • kofe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      You just made me realize I haven’t seen the sweet ol girl by my buddy’s place in a while and now I’m sad :(

    • nowwhatnapster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Fwiw my childhood indoor/outdoor cat lived to 19 whereas my indoor only cats got terminal cancer at 13. But generally speaking I believe you are correct.

  • DessertStorms@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    5 months ago

    If you want to give your kitty companion the best shot at a long comfortable life, keep them indoors, it’s as simple as that.
    Leads exist, and so do catios and window boxes if you’re lucky enough to have the space, they can still enjoy the sunshine and fresh air without risk of them getting run over, attacked by another animal/person, getting injured otherwise. I know I just couldn’t bear it if my baby was outside all on her own and got hurt…

    • CashewNut 🏴󠁢󠁥󠁧󠁿@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      I’m guessing your American? If you try finding a rescue cat for indoors they won’t let you have one. Most cats in the UK and any given by charities are outdoor cats.

      So everyone insisting on one of the other is being very… Annoyingly ignorant!

      • stufkes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yeah I only know this viewpoint from posters in the US. In Europe I only know the prevailing notion that keeping cats indoors is cruel and they should be outside. Exceptions for large cities ofc but I only know social pressure to get cats out, not keep them in.

        • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          I guess Finland is an exception. Here you’re not supposed to let cats roam free because they could get hurt or die and it would be irresponsible pet ownership. Some still do it ofc.

      • Devi@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 months ago

        That’s not true. I have 2 rescue cats currently indoor only and have had more previously. There’s a few rescues I can think of that look for outdoor homes, and a few who are strictly indoor, but most are quite open minded.

    • Lizardking27@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      32
      ·
      5 months ago

      Yeah, cats are safer if you never let them go outside, sure.

      So are humans. But would you want to live like that?

      • The Dark Lord ☑️@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        We don’t let small children cross the street by themselves. That’s because kids have no concept of what a street is, or how dangerous it is. Same for cats, but add in plenty of predators and diseases. Outdoor cats have a much shorter life expectancy than indoor cats.

      • chaogomu@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        5 months ago

        I do live like that.

        Importantly, while cats are safer indoors, vulnerable wildlife is much safer when cats are indoors.

      • MxM111@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        You running in forests, hunting for food with bare hands, fighting with bears for survival?

      • wellee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        That’s my thought exactly. But they have the mind of a child, so there has to be a middle ground especially if living in a town or busy street. No idea what that could be. If only cats would stay inside the yard, or a cat park like dogs lol.

        But keeping them indoors 100% of the time? Total wrong end of the spectrum, borderline abuse.

    • seathru@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Agreed. All the strays are heartbreaking, they deserve homes!

      • Lvxferre@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Accordingly to my cat (and apparently Sarah Andersen’s), this is a reliable way to give a stray a new home:

        I’m not too eager to trust her biased sampling though.

        [Serious now, we should be more active on that. Also to discourage people from letting cats to “take a walk” unsupervised.]

        • seathru@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          5 months ago

          Can confirm. Cats always choose you, but sometimes it’s more forcefully. This big boy busted through an open window, used the liter box, and proclaimed himself king.

    • sphfaar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      It is not their habitat, from experience I have had many cats, and in my opinion it is better to be able to leave them free so that they can go in and out without going where it needs to be clean.

      • glimse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Depends on if you live on a farm or not*

        It’s not like European outdoor cats don’t murder wildlife and get killed

        • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          I don’t get what this comment is about. Is suburban North America especially dangerous for cats?

          • nickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            I don’t get what this comment is about. Is suburban North America especially dangerous for cats?

            I suspect that they are meaning that suburban Americans are known for being very opinionated, judgemental, and overly concerned with what others do with their lives.

            However, for your question, if on the peripheries, yes. There is danger to cats from cars but also coyotes, raccoons, and native big cats (bobcats, lynx, and cougars, as well as humans (was terrified for my cat when I lived in a place where serial cat mutilations started taking place). I grew up with outdoor cats but generally have preferred to keep them inside, unless it was not possible (people who think that it’s a case of ignoring a “whiny” cat have obviously never experienced the craftiness and terrorism employed by a feline that grew up semi-feral in the woods).

            My reasoning is very similar to you Finns. I distinctly remember, as a child, finding one of my semi-feral cat friends frozen to death next to a pond in the forest during a particularly cold winter. As a child, we also lost near a dozen cats over the years to wildlife and cat haters in cars intentionally hitting them. That’s just too much.

            I want my cats to live as long and happy a life as possible so, as an adult, when we adopted kittens, we kept them inside. They have windows, toys, and companionship that keeps them from feeling the need to be outdoors.

  • Boingboing@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    5 months ago

    Live in Sweden and have 3 cats. Two are outdoor cats and one wanted to be an outdoor cat but he kinda realised he is fat and lazy and wants to stay home. So this felt very accurate for the cats who live with me!

    Oh and in Sweden all cats are tagged and registered in case any should go missing. I could not imagine a world where I would deny my cats the right to go outside. Then again I did move to the countryside just so my cats could have a better life far away from traffic.