• Mostly_Gristle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    111
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    10 months ago

    Student: “Hey, a shortcut! Let me first just walk around the long way so I can measure the length of the other two sides, multiply those lengths by themselves, add them together, and find out how much extra walking I’ve saved myself by taking the shortcut. Boy, this shortcut sure is saving me a lot of effort. Hooray Pythagoras!”

  • DanglingFury@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    63
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    There’s a college in Chicago, i think it’s IIT maybe, that used aerial photography to map out the student cow paths, then they redid all the sidewalks to incorporate those paths.

    Edit: they ended up adding a building in a grassy area and maintained all the hall/walkways of the building in line with the sidewalks/cowpaths. Kinda neat.

  • CashewNut 🏴󠁢󠁥󠁧󠁿@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    I wish I was taught about the usefulness of maths growing up. When I did A-level with differentition and integration I quickly forgot as I didn’t see a point in it.

    At about 35 someone mentioned diff and int are useful for loan repayment calculations, savings and mortgages.

    Blew my fucking mind cos those are useful!

    • thehatfox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      That’s one of the big problems with maths teaching in the UK, it’s almost actively hostile to giving any sort of context.

      When a subject is reduced to a chore done for its own sake it’s no wonder most students don’t develop a passion or interest in it.

      • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        10 months ago

        In the US it’s common to give students “word problems” that describe a scenario and ask them to answer a question that requires applying whatever math they’re studying at the time. Students hate them and criticize the problems for being unrealistic, but I think they really just hate word problems because because they find them difficult. To me that means they need more word problems so they can actually get used to thinking about how math relates to the real world.

        • commandar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          Part of what makes all the hatred for Common Core math so hilarious to me is that when I finally saw what they were teaching, it was a moment of “holy shit, this is exactly how I use and do math in real life.” It’s full of contextualizing with a focus on teaching mental shortcuts that allow you to quickly land on ballpark answers. I think it’s absolutely wonderful.

          But it’s so foreign to the rote manner that a lot of parents were taught that many of them have a hard time grasping it, and get angry as a result.

        • gandalf_der_12te@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          I don’t see it that way. Most “word problems” are just poorly posed, lack important information, or are ambiguous. Often, they are mostly fairly unrealistic.

          It would be better to describe usage scenarios, talk about examples in class, and give exercises which have a clear, discernible pattern. Like, actual physics problems.

        • R0cket_M00se@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Nah, the word problems suck because they’re intended to teach you how to convert word problems into math problems. They did absolutely nothing to show how math is used in real world scenarios.

        • Gestrid@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          There are three problems I had with word problems in school. Not every problem applied to every word problem.

          1. “This is way too vague.”

          2. “Why would someone buy 35 apples and 23 oranges?”

          3. “Why would the person in the problem want to try to figure this problem out? It’s completely unrelated to what they were doing.”

          I get the point was for us to be able to convert information given in a text format into something we can actually solve, but the word problems were usually situations you’d never realistically find yourself in in real life.

    • TimeSquirrel@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      10 months ago

      Hated Algebra in high school. Then years later got into programming. It’s all algebra. Variables, variables everywhere.

      • lhamil64@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        10 months ago

        Ehh I wouldn’t say variables in programming are all that similar to variables in algebra. In a programming language, variables typically are just a name for some data. Whereas in algebra, they are placeholders for unknown values.

    • onion@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      The other use is as a door-opener; Learning these maths fundamentals enables you to pursue a stem degree

      • CashewNut 🏴󠁢󠁥󠁧󠁿@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        10 months ago

        as a door-opener

        You say that but they still need to teach you the “why”. For example I did A-level maths which was a door to learning discrete maths in uni. Matrices, graphs, etc.

        In 20yrs as a software dev I never used any of it. Only needed basic arithmetic.

        To this day I’ve got no bloody clue what the point of matrices are.

        • lobut@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          10 months ago

          I used them in computer graphics and game programming. As a regular software dev, not so much.

        • onion@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          They’re used for manipulating vectors.
          Just like how in
          v
          the a makes the vector v longer or shorter, in
          v
          M can change the vector, for example rotate it.

          Just like vectors and other mathematical objects, matrices are purely theoretical concepts. There is no direct real-life meaning to them.
          However, there are a bunch of real-world problems where matrices can be put to use to calculate something meaningful.

          • CashewNut 🏴󠁢󠁥󠁧󠁿@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            I fucking loved maths mechanics which is like applied maths/physics. So you’d calculate the distance a ball is thrown or a cannon ball dropped from a cliff. Don’t think we ever did matrices in it though. I enjoyed it so much I’d do excersizes in the book for fun!! That and politics were the only courses I was passionate about.

            But I became a software dev that didn’t use maths or politics. :/

            So from age 5-17 I hated maths cos I saw no point in it. Until I hit 17 and someone said I can work out how fast a fucking cannon ball travels on impact?! I mean holy dog shit! If someone told me that in primary school I’d have loved maths!

            It was very much taught as a means to answer questions though rather than application. So as an adult I’d have to be shown how a number could be found using algebra. But because it wasn’t in an algebra question format it went over my head. It literally required someone taking numbers I’d been given and putting them in a line with letters before my brain engaged to “Oh shit - algebra! I know this!”.

            Another example is differentiation. I recently looked up my notes and remembered it was told to us very mechanically: f(x) = 4x^3 => f'(x) = 4(3x^2) = 12x^2

            No idea why that’s the case - it just is.

            It’s a shame cos I learnt I love maths at 17 but by that point I’d lost years of potential.

            P.S. any advice on where I can re-learn real-world maths? I’d love to redo my teens maths learning for fun.

    • Transporter Room 3@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      Beyond the general “hehe funny meme” Some seem to think there’s some kind of math going on in people’s heads other than “shortcut”

      The knowledge of Pythagoras or math doesn’t factor in here at all. Toddlers do this.

      Having the knowledge just gives you fancy words for the resulting coincidental shape.

      • TimeSquirrel@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Having the knowledge just gives you fancy words for the resulting coincidental shape.

        Isn’t that basically all of physics? Just an abstract concept to describe something that sort of fits the rules we extrapolated from observations so far.

    • myslsl@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Yeah, true. No Euclidean distances implicit to this problem. Oh, wait…

  • lseif@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    10 months ago

    all the student needs to know is c<a+b, not the actual formula or theory behind it

  • pflanzenregal@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    I think this is more a case of the triangle inequality in metric spaces, as you don’t have to calculate any particular edge to see the shortcut, as well as that it applies to any even non-rectangular triangle.

    • petersr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      But if you want to know your saving, you will need to dust off the old formula. And if you do, you find the maximum saving to be around 41% (in the case of isosceles right triangle where the hypotenuse is a factor of sqrt 2 shorter).

  • Gestrid@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Now, I’m wondering if we have a thriving Desire Paths (that’s what these paths are called) community somewhere on here.

  • KptnAutismus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    this is actually the one thing i am glad to have learned in math class. saves me a lot of guesswork sometimes.

    • fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      I can’t think of when I’ve actually used it.

      I’ve seen comments about how 3, 4, 5 allows you to make a square corner with a tape measure, but I’ve never had an opportunity to use that trick.

      I find myself trying to guess the area of things a lot more.

  • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    I have literally done this calculation in my head while walking before to see if it was faster to cut the corner or walk around. Nice!